TSM and G2 players won’t be part of the 2020 All-Star event

TL;DR

  • TSM players voluntarily withdrew from 2020 All-Star following disastrous 0-6 Worlds performance
  • Bjergsen’s retirement and Doublelift’s consideration marked end of era for team
  • Multiple LEC teams including G2 and Fnatic stars also opted out simultaneously
  • Organizational restructuring and mental health recovery took priority over exhibition events
  • The collective opt-outs signal maturing esports industry prioritizing long-term success

As the 2020 All-Star voting commences, the esports community faces unexpected roster gaps with several iconic competitors deliberately excluding themselves from participation. This strategic withdrawal represents more than individual decisions—it reflects evolving priorities in professional gaming organizations.

Team SoloMid’s entire roster made the conscious choice to remove themselves from All-Star eligibility, despite the event’s transition to a fully online format with regional studio participation. The three-day digital spectacle will feature various competitive formats, highlighted by the popular one-versus-one tournament that typically showcases individual player prowess.

Why TSM’s All-Star Absence Signals Deeper Organizational Shifts

Historically, TSM competitors alongside Team Liquid representatives dominated All-Star fan voting, making their collective absence particularly noteworthy. Veteran stars Søren “Bjergsen” Bjerg and Yiliang “Doublelift” Peng had become staple attractions at previous All-Star gatherings, yet neither will make appearances in this year’s edition.

The October announcement of Bjergsen’s transition from professional play to TSM’s head coaching position dashed fan hopes for a ceremonial final competitive appearance. Doublelift remains under contract but openly contemplated retirement, indicating broader career evaluation among established players.

While remaining TSM members haven’t publicly detailed their reasoning, the underlying motivations become apparent upon examination. The team’s catastrophic performance at the 2020 World Championship—finishing with an unprecedented 0-6 record—created psychological and professional repercussions. This dismal outcome marked TSM as the inaugural first-seed qualifier from a major region to fail securing a single match victory.

Beyond the competitive humiliation, TSM entered a comprehensive organizational transformation phase. The search for a new primary mid laner, coupled with rumors of multiple roster changes for 2021, created an environment where players naturally sought respite following the season’s conclusion. The impending structural modifications made postseason recovery and mental preparation essential priorities.

European Esports Organizations Mirror TSM’s Strategic Approach

TSM’s decision reflects a broader industry pattern, with G2 Esports similarly withdrawing their squad from All-Star consideration. G2 faces speculated roster adjustments after falling short of 2020 World Championship finals expectations. From Fnatic’s camp, both Tim “Nemesis” Lipovšek and Martin “Rekkles” Larsson elected to bypass the 2020 All-Star festivities, suggesting coordinated strategic thinking across top organizations.

The synchronized withdrawals from major organizations indicate a maturation in esports management philosophy. Where previously All-Star participation was considered obligatory for fan engagement, teams now weigh exhibition events against player recovery, strategic planning, and long-term competitive positioning. This evolution mirrors traditional sports where postseason events require careful consideration against athlete welfare and organizational objectives.

Professional gamers face unique burnout challenges, with the condensed 2020 season creating additional pressure. The decision to prioritize mental health and team development over promotional appearances represents significant progress in how organizations value their human capital. For teams like TSM navigating significant roster transitions, the additional commitment of All-Star participation could disrupt crucial team-building phases and impede 2021 preparation.

The pattern also reveals how poor international performance triggers comprehensive reassessment cycles. Teams returning from disappointing Worlds appearances often enter periods of intense introspection, making voluntary exhibition competitions less appealing. The industry’s growing recognition of performance psychology means organizations now consider the cumulative competitive load on their players.

Action Checklist

  • Analyze post-season player recovery needs before committing to exhibition events
  • Evaluate organizational restructuring timelines against optional competitive commitments
  • Assess mental health impact of poor tournament performances on player participation decisions
  • Review industry patterns in team decision-making for strategic alignment
  • Develop balanced approach weighing fan expectations against long-term competitive goals

No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » TSM and G2 players won’t be part of the 2020 All-Star event Understanding TSM's strategic decision to skip the 2020 All-Star event and what it reveals about esports team management