The numbers say these are the top 10 teams in CSGO

WIN.gg introduces its inaugural Counter-Strike: Global Offensive power rankings, leveraging comprehensive statistical analysis to deliver unprecedented accuracy in team evaluation.

These comprehensive rankings may spark debate among enthusiasts. However, employing an advanced statistical algorithm that processes all available CSGO competitive data ensures these assessments reflect not only current performance levels but also project sustainable competitive trajectories.

No. 1 – Astralis

The data unequivocally positions Astralis as the world’s premier CSGO squad, with statistical evidence supporting this conclusion. Despite experiencing performance fluctuations during summer competitions, the Danish powerhouse demonstrated remarkable adaptability while integrating temporary replacements for Lukas “gla1ve” Rossander and Andreas “Xyp9x” Højsleth. With primary shot-caller gla1ve reinstated and demonstrating sharp form, Astralis now fields four of its five championship-winning competitors.

Although Xyp9x remains absent from active competition, emerging talent Patrik “es3tag” Hansen has seamlessly filled the vacancy. Originally identified as potential reinforcement back in April, es3tag now validates why he represented the organization’s initial selection. Both gla1ve and es3tag have delivered exceptional performances throughout September. Following an initial setback in ESL Pro League Season 12’s opening match, Astralis astonished the professional circuit with its rapid return to championship form.

gla1ve encountered difficulties during his return engagement against Complexity and their undervalued strategic leader Benjamin “blameF” Bremmer, while also struggling versus Vitality and Ninjas in Pyjamas. All three encounters witnessed the in-game leader recording subpar kill-death-assist ratios, yet his contributions remain fundamental to Astralis’ achievements. His reinstatement has significantly benefited the Danish organization overall, with gla1ve guiding the team to convincing victories while assimilating es3tag into Astralis’ tactical framework.

es3tag and gla1ve are deadly on Train

During their Train confrontation with FaZe, Astralis demonstrated championship intent. Despite dropping both initial pistol rounds, the Danish squad dominated the international lineup 16-5, though this outcome doesn’t represent the most compelling statistical insight. Instead, initial engagement statistics reveal the complete narrative.

Astralis secured an extraordinary 90% of rounds when achieving first blood. Historically across all competitive maps, Astralis has never maintained a first elimination victory percentage exceeding 79.2%. However, this iteration of Astralis exhibits distinctive characteristics, primarily es3tag’s offensive capabilities. He ranks second in terrorist-side opening duel success rates over the past month, securing eliminations at a remarkable 66.7% frequency. This impactful statistic creates strategic map control opportunities for the remaining Danish veterans to establish dominance and secure offensive round victories for a traditionally defense-oriented organization.

Astralis demonstrates strategic flexibility regarding es3tag’s opening duel timing decisions. He ranks 11th in total attempts while being among only three competitors maintaining positive performance ratings for these engagements since September’s commencement.

Train’s strategic significance extends beyond individual performance metrics. Astralis has already contested Train 17 times in 2020 compared to just 18 total appearances throughout 2019. The organization is strategically modifying its map selection repertoire, potentially anticipating competitive pool evolution or maintaining opponent uncertainty. Rumored internal organizational turbulence hasn’t manifested in competitive performance outside of gla1ve and Xpy9x’s absence. With es3tag fulfilling a previously absent but non-essential role for championship success, substantial probability exists that es3tag will maintain active participation or rotational involvement moving forward. This represents a formidable competitive proposition.

No 2. – Evil Geniuses

The North American representative secures second position based on two undeniable competitive factors. First, they’ve repeatedly demonstrated capacity to defeat any global opponent given appropriate competitive conditions. Second, Evil Geniuses’ lineup demonstrates exceptional proficiency in creating those optimal circumstances.

While analytical discussions frequently focus on the organization’s imported sniper specialist, Tsvetelin “CeRq” Dimitrov, EG’s true competitive advantage manifests in how it has developed domestic talent. Ethan “Ethan” Arnold and Vincent “Brehze” Cayonte have progressively evolved into respected veteran competitors. These two represent cornerstone performers with exceptional mechanical skills, and their competitive influence cannot be overstated.

Twelve months prior, NRG Esports controlled EG’s competitive roster, with their StarLadder Berlin Major performance generating significant attention. Subsequently, EG acquired NRG’s lineup before dispatching them to IEM New York 2019. Evil Geniuses unexpectedly defeated Astralis in that tournament’s championship finals with a decisive 3-1 victory margin.

Their sustained dominance within North American competitive circuits facilitated international achievement.

EG’s settled differences turn it into an international CSGO contender

Currently, EG has demonstrated substantial internal development among roster members. Established CSGO veterans, including Tarik “tarik” Celik and Peter “Stanislaw” Jarguz, maintain consistent performance levels. Similar to gla1ve, Stanislaw provides strategic direction while maintaining lower statistical performance, highlighting both surrounding talent quality and his own tactical acumen. Statistical analysis consistently demonstrates that primary shot-callers typically record inferior statistics compared to teammates, though Stanislaw doesn’t negatively impact team performance. He, alongside head coach Wilton “zews” Prado, have established productive collaboration following previous disagreements during their Team Liquid tenure.

“During my complete tenure with Liquid, I consistently felt isolated in disagreeing with Zews regarding his strategic concepts and operational preferences,” Stanislaw previously stated.

Now the two have established collaborative alignment resulting in an EG lineup exhibiting minimal competitive vulnerabilities. Instead, opposing organizations encounter fundamentally sound Counter-Strike execution each round, with EG rarely experiencing tactical surprises. Complementing the organization’s mechanical proficiency, CSGO’s online competitive period has provided the necessary competitive boost to surpass Team Liquid for North American supremacy.

Since May 29, EG has contested 52 competitive maps while recording an impressive 39 victories, 1 draw, and 12 defeats. Inferno represents the team’s strategic stronghold, effectively countering a frequently selected map in best-of-three series, achieving an 86.7% victory rate on CSGO’s popular battleground where they’ve secured 13 wins against 2 losses during this timeframe.
Their roster members demonstrate equivalent proficiency on less frequently played maps, evidenced by their 5-1 series performance on Train.

Additional consideration: Four of EG’s 12 map defeats occurred against MIBR, though this appears less concerning considering MIBR’s comprehensive dysfunction versus other competitive organizations. MIBR comprehensively defeated Stanislaw and his competitors overall, though MIBR’s Gabriel “FalleN” Toledo possesses comprehensive understanding of EG head coach zews’ strategic methodology.

EG’s enhanced fundamental execution will persist when professional CSGO resumes LAN competition, currently scheduled for December’s IEM Global Challenge. Meanwhile, EG will continue developing as it solidifies the robust, foundational structure that Stanislaw and zews have collaboratively established.

No. 3 – G2 Esports

If casual CSGO enthusiasts were questioned about G2’s Audric “JaCkz” Jug’s age, most would likely estimate early twenties. These assumptions would prove incorrect.
JaCkz represents G2’s most experienced competitor, with G2’s lineup featuring one of professional Counter-Strike’s highest average roster ages currently competing, directly contradicting casual perceptions of youthful, ambitious teams pursuing championship achievements.

G2 enters competitive discussions during periods of strong performance, though without emerging star talent, their achievements relative to player age cannot be minimized. The roster averages nearly three years above professional CSGO’s mean competitor age, with their veteran performers not disputing leadership responsibilities as witnessed in organizations like OG. Instead, they uniformly execute tactical instructions from the organization’s youngest member, primary strategist Nemanja “nexa” Isaković.

Unfortunately, any competitor can demonstrate strong performance in online CSGO, though G2’s competitive motivation doesn’t originate from prize distributions or scoreboard results. It derives from professional environments and competitive stakes capable of overwhelming lesser organizations.

G2 demonstrates substantially greater competitive strength than superficial scoreline examination reveals, though most enthusiasts terminate analysis at this superficial level. Therefore, while most ranking systems position G2 significantly lower, potentially focusing on recent ESL Pro League setbacks, they disregard exceptional performance during ESL One Cologne’s semifinal matches occurring less than thirty days prior. As demonstrated by 2019’s post-Major ENCE ranking trajectory, rapidly adjusting team positioning represents suboptimal methodology.

Instead, statistical evidence indicates G2 is performing consistent with their 2019 online statistical performance. Unless organizational leadership demands immediate results during online competitive periods, G2 should focus on December’s IEM Global Challenge rather than disrupting what rendered their experienced lineup initially effective.

G2 is defying history and statistics with CSGO performances

This doesn’t imply G2 won’t experience defeats against inferior opponents currently, though it also doesn’t alter the reality that the organization possesses superior talent compared to lower-ranked competitors. Instead, G2’s third-position ranking acknowledges early 2020 competitive success preceding global disruption impacts. Six months have elapsed since G2’s last LAN tournament participation, though preceding their defeat against Natus Vincere in IEM Katowice’s championship finals, this seasoned, formidable team established on veteran Kenny “KennyS” Schrub maintained a LAN map performance record of 14 victories and 3 defeats.

Those 14 triumphs occurred against organizations G2 statistically should have lost to theoretically, including Liquid and Fnatic. Those specific matchups witnessed G2’s opponents being comprehensively outmaneuvered by nexa while G2’s roster efficiently dispatched 100Thieves and OG by double-digit round margins. This validated their competitors’ capacity to navigate tactical traps and statistically superior opponents. However, while G2’s online performance record appears substantially weaker, this primarily results from competitive landscape and format variations rather than organizational performance degradation.

Truly exceptional organizations succeed and excel before 50,000 enthusiastic spectators. Merely competent teams can secure online victories. Significantly reduced competitive pressure exists when participating in what might otherwise represent scrimmage or casual competition from residential settings. For various reasons, financial incentives typically carry reduced significance when competitors relax in casual attire. However, G2’s established talent base achieved success before live audiences and during high-pressure competitive situations. Had Na`Vi not transformed into Astralis during Katowice, G2 would have secured championship victory. For contextual understanding, Na`Vi hasn’t sustained its IEM breakthrough performance, further supporting the perspective that the championship final matchup represented greater statistical anomaly for Na`Vi than competitive failure from G2.

Therefore, despite G2 recently experiencing consecutive defeats during ESL Pro League competition, ranking systems cannot disregard dominant LAN performance records in favor of more recent setbacks. G2 secures narrow victories online but experiences decisive defeats, and when these elements are evaluated alongside their 2020 LAN campaign, G2 emerges as an organization significantly motivated by elite competition.

G2’s unpublicized online triumphs versus Astralis and their initial engagement against Heroic at ESL One Cologne demonstrate the organization’s competitive strengths despite format modifications. Their semifinal defeat against Heroic during ESL One Cologne initially appears as competitive blemish. Reconsider this perspective.
While an emerging Ninjas in Pyjamas roster was comprehensively outplayed on Cologne bracket’s opposite side, Heroic required 21 overtime rounds across two maps to secure series victory. G2 remains authentic championship contender.

Common Strategic Evaluation Mistakes

Many enthusiasts commit fundamental analytical errors when assessing team performance. Overemphasizing recent match outcomes while ignoring historical performance trends represents the most prevalent mistake. Teams like G2 demonstrate that LAN performance provides more accurate competitive assessment than online results during transitional competitive periods.

Another critical error involves misunderstanding in-game leader statistical performance. Strategic shot-callers typically record inferior elimination statistics compared to dedicated fraggers, yet their strategic value transcends statistical measurements.

Advanced Team Evaluation Methodology

Professional analysts employ comprehensive evaluation frameworks that extend beyond basic win-loss records. Key performance indicators include opening duel success rates, map control percentages, and economic management efficiency.

When analyzing team performance, consider these advanced metrics: First elimination conversion rates (how teams capitalize on initial picks), post-plant execution efficiency, and defensive retake success percentages.

Teams demonstrating consistent improvement across multiple statistical categories typically maintain sustainable competitive trajectories.

WIN.gg’s inaugural Counter-Strike: Global Offensive rankings leverage advanced statistical algorithms to deliver unprecedented accuracy in team evaluation.

These data-driven assessments may challenge conventional wisdom, but they provide reliable predictions for future competitive outcomes based on comprehensive performance metrics.

No. 1 – Astralis

Metrics confirm Astralis retains global supremacy despite temporary roster disruptions. The Danish powerhouse demonstrated remarkable adaptability during summer transitions, particularly impressive given the absence of key players Lukas “gla1ve” Rossander and Andreas “Xyp9x” Højsleth.

With gla1ve reinstated and performing at elite levels, Astralis now fields four of its five Major championship players, creating formidable statistical advantages.

Patrik “es3tag” Hansen has emerged as the organization’s strategic masterstroke, originally identified as temporary support in April but now proving instrumental in the team’s statistical dominance.

es3tag and gla1ve are deadly on Train

Astralis’s Train performance against FaZe revealed statistical anomalies that defy conventional analysis. Despite losing both pistol rounds, the team secured a decisive 16-5 victory, but the opening duel statistics tell the most compelling story.

The team achieved an extraordinary 90% round conversion rate when securing first blood, significantly exceeding their historical 79.2% average across all competitive maps.

Es3tag’s offensive capabilities create statistical advantages that transform traditionally CT-favored maps into offensive strongholds.

Train’s strategic importance cannot be overstated. Astralis has already competed on Train 17 times in 2020, nearly matching their total 2019 appearances, indicating strategic map pool evolution.

No 2. – Evil Geniuses

The North American roster claims second position through two statistically verifiable factors: demonstrated capacity to defeat any global opponent under optimal conditions, and exceptional ability to create those advantageous situations.

While discussions frequently focus on imported AWPer Tsvetelin “CeRq” Dimitrov, EG’s statistical strength actually derives from domestic talent development.

Ethan “Ethan” Arnold and Vincent “Brehze” Cayonte have evolved into statistically significant veterans whose mechanical proficiency creates foundational advantages.

EG’s settled differences turn it into an international CSGO contender

EG’s internal development metrics show substantial growth. Veterans including Tarik “tarik” Celek and Peter “Stanislaw” Jarguz maintain statistical consistency, while Stanislaw’s leadership from statistically lower positions actually demonstrates the roster’s overall strength rather than individual weakness.

The resolution between Stanislaw and head coach Wilton “zews” Prado represents a statistical turning point, transforming previous disagreements into competitive advantages.

Since May 29, EG has competed in 52 maps, achieving an impressive 39-1-12 record that demonstrates statistical dominance.

Inferno represents EG’s statistical playground, achieving an 86.7% win rate on this frequently contested best-of-three map.

No. 3 – G2 Esports

Conventional assumptions about G2’s roster age distribution contain significant statistical inaccuracies.

Audric “JaCkz” Jug represents G2’s most experienced competitor, with the team boasting one of the highest average age profiles in professional Counter-Strike, directly contradicting typical expectations about youthful, ambitious rosters pursuing championships.

G2 enters competitive discussions primarily during successful periods, but their achievement relative to player age demographics represents a statistical anomaly worth examination.

Online performance metrics often misrepresent true competitive capability. G2’s motivation derives not from financial incentives or statistical standings, but from high-pressure environments that statistically overwhelm less experienced teams.

G2’s competitive strength extends far beyond superficial scoreline analysis, which represents where most analytical assessments terminate prematurely.

G2 is defying history and statistics with CSGO performances

Statistical analysis reveals G2 performing at levels consistent with their 2019 online statistics, suggesting organizational patience during the online competitive era.

The roster’s statistical profile demonstrates resilience against theoretically superior opponents, with their 14-3 LAN map record before IEM Katowice demonstrating exceptional high-pressure performance capabilities.

True competitive excellence requires teams that statistically thrive before massive audiences, while online victories often reflect competent rather than exceptional performance levels.

G2’s statistical profile reveals a team exceptionally motivated by elite competition rather than routine matchups.

No. 4 – BIG Clan

BIG has statistically evolved into a comprehensively solid competitive unit, achieving this transformation through extensive competitive volume and strategic refinement.

Against opponents with average rankings within top-ten parameters, BIG statistically leads all teams in kill-to-death differential at +245, while matching Astralis in K/D ratio at 1.06, positioning just behind Complexity’s 1.08 metric.

BIG exemplifies the statistical principle that practice volume correlates with performance improvement.

Florian “syrsoN” Rische represents BIG’s most statistically significant acquisition, with his AWP proficiency demonstrating historical consistency across both LAN and online competitive environments throughout 2020.

No. 5 – Complexity

Complexity and BIG both demonstrate statistical benefits from organizational strategies focused on complementary roster construction.

Achieving statistical balance between aggressive playmakers and foundational components presents significant challenges, but Complexity has statistically achieved this delicate equilibrium.

Statistical analysis reveals everything originates from blameF’s leadership. In what statistically resembles a constructed competitive entity, Complexity’s roster supports their in-game leader rather than following conventional hierarchical structures.

No. 6 Team Liquid

Michael “Grim” Wince’s addition statistically alters Liquid’s competitive positioning significantly.

Liquid’s statistical predictability will experience temporary fluctuations during Grim’s integration period, but historical data suggests performance trajectory improvement as roster stability increases.

No. 7 – FURIA

FURIA’s statistical ascent as Brazil’s premier competitive unit mirrors their global ranking improvement.

Overpass gives FURIA big advantage

Statistical highlights for Brazil’s top contender include Overpass performance metrics so statistically dominant that opponents frequently employ strategic bans.

No. 8 – Vitality

Initial statistical assessment might suggest Vitality deserves higher positioning. Despite Mathieu “ZywOo” Herbaut’s statistically exceptional performances, roster consistency metrics prevent higher placement.

Vitality’s statistical profile reveals dependency on individual star performance rather than balanced roster contribution.

No. 9 – Natus Vincere

Similar statistical patterns emerge for Na’Vi as with G2, where the roster statistically performs optimally in high-pressure competitive environments.

No. 10 – FaZe Clan

FaZe occupies statistically challenging competitive territory. Player performance metrics indicate continued downward statistical trajectory through 2020’s conclusion.

WIN.gg’s inaugural Counter-Strike: Global Offensive rankings employ advanced statistical modeling to deliver unprecedented accuracy in team evaluations.

While these placements may spark debate among traditionalists, the underlying algorithm processes comprehensive CSGO data to forecast both current standings and future trajectory patterns.

No. 6 Team Liquid

Michael “Grim” Wince’s integration into Team Liquid creates substantial positional shifts within the competitive landscape. His statistical output demonstrates measurable improvement over predecessor Nick “nitr0” Cannella, while his calculated aggression provides crucial equilibrium for a lineup that previously lacked tactical balance under Jake “Stewie2K” Yip’s leadership transition.

Liquid enters a phase of strategic unpredictability during Grim’s adaptation period as Stewie2k solidifies command structures. Historical patterns suggest parallels to Liquid’s 2019 success following strategic additions that enabled their Astralis upset. Data projections indicate similar developmental arcs, leveraging Grim’s extensive online competitive background. However, the transition to LAN environments may reveal performance gaps similar to Russell “Twistzz” Van Dulken’s early career transition challenges. The organization’s long-term trajectory appears increasingly positive as distance grows from the roster adjustment, potentially culminating in peak performance during upcoming IEM New York Online or subsequent BLAST Fall competitions.

No. 7 – FURIA

FURIA’s ascension as Brazil’s premier CSGO organization reflects directly in global ranking improvements. The team’s achievements stem from an aggressively adaptive default strategy that dynamically reinforces defensive vulnerabilities while capitalizing on offensive openings with near-instantaneous reaction timing.

Overpass gives FURIA tactical superiority

Statistical analysis reveals FURIA’s Overpass dominance forces opponents into strategic bans, granting veto process control through exceptional statistical performance. Even when facing initial player disadvantages on Overpass, the team maintains an impressive 43% round victory rate, exceeding Astralis’ 2018 Nuke recovery statistics by three percentage points. Contextual comparison shows average teams achieve approximately 28% success rates under similar conditions. Throughout 2020, FURIA maintains a dominant 7-1 competitive record when opponents challenge their map control.

No. 8 – Vitality

Initial assessment suggests Vitality deserves higher placement than their current eighth position. Their second-place ESL One Cologne finish, complemented by additional runner-up performances, represents significant competitive achievement. However, despite Mathieu “ZywOo” Herbaut’s exceptional contributions, roster consistency issues prevent breakthrough into championship territory.

Vitality’s tournament progression frequently benefits from favorable bracket placements with victories over struggling organizations like FaZe and Fnatic. Statistical models prioritize team-wide consistency over individual star performance, making their CS Summit 6 defeat against BIG particularly damaging, especially considering their upper bracket advantage. Despite competitive wins against resurgent Ninjas in Pyjamas and multiple high placements, Vitality cannot establish upward momentum without developing reliable victory methods against elite competition.

Throughout 2020, Vitality maintains sub-50% victory rates against top-tier opponents. This statistical profile aligns with mid-table contenders rather than championship-caliber teams.

No. 9 – Natus Vincere

Similar to G2’s competitive profile, Na`Vi demonstrates peak performance in high-pressure competitive environments where strategic stakes maximize performance output.

Statistical evaluation independently confirms Oleksandr “s1mple” Kostyliev’s status among CSGO’s elite competitors regardless of team performance context. His K/D ratio surpasses 2019 Player of the Year Mathieu “ZywOo” Herbaut, despite frequent comparative analysis between the two players. Even with shared physical competition spaces, s1mple cannot replicate the competitive excitement generated by Na`Vi’s IEM Katowice 2020 championship run.

The organization faces challenges beyond statistical measurements. Tactical spacing deficiencies became evident during ESL One Cologne 2020, highlighted by poorly executed spray control sequences.

Na`Vi maintains one of professional CSGO’s lengthiest average execution timings, a characteristic shared among many CIS region teams. Strategic improvements depend on Kirill “boombl4” Mikhailov’s in-game leadership development and Ilya “Perfecto” Zalutskiy elevating his competitive performance to elite levels. Roster adjustments may become necessary given Perfecto’s performance regression from 2019’s solid 1.09 rating to 2020’s 0.99 online season performance.

No. 10 – FaZe Clan

FaZe confronts significant organizational challenges. Player performance metrics indicate continuing downward trends through 2020’s conclusion, creating complex management decisions. Trade speculation surrounding Nikola “NiKo” Kovač’s potential move to G2, combined with Markus “Kjaerbye” Kjærbye’s recent integration, suggests FaZe may initiate mid-year roster adjustments similar to other organizations.

FaZe’s star-powered roster traditionally excels in LAN environments, though such performance spikes remain infrequent even during limited 2020 competitions.

The organization maintains minimal competitive flexibility, primarily attributable to recent roster modifications and associated adaptation phases. Should NiKo depart FaZe, competitive struggles in premier CSGO tournaments appear inevitable, with potential rankings decline beyond the top ten positions despite roster talents like Marcelo “coldzera” David. Potential success likely derives from emerging talent Helvijs “broky” Saukants, who has statistically outperformed veteran teammates throughout 2020.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » The numbers say these are the top 10 teams in CSGO