Phoenix1 organization accused of not paying Valorant roster

TL;DR

  • Former Phoenix1 player Aiden King alleges unpaid $1,300 tournament winnings from January trial period
  • Players competed without signed contracts during assessment period from January 9-30, 2021
  • Organization requested tournament winnings directly but failed to distribute to players
  • Phoenix1 has not issued official statement regarding payment allegations
  • Current Phoenix1 entity is separate from original organization that rebranded to Sentinels

The attempted resurgence of the Phoenix1 gaming brand has encountered significant obstacles, with payment disputes now threatening its credibility in the esports community.

Professional Valorant competitor Aiden King has publicly accused the organization of withholding financial compensation from its former roster. The entire Phoenix1 competitive squad was unexpectedly released in January without clear explanation, despite earlier hints about potential transfers to other organizations. Following weeks of silence, King has chosen to disclose the circumstances surrounding his departure and the unresolved payment situation.

Sentinels’ Phoenix1 Payment Controversy

Through a detailed Twitter statement, King revealed he never formally contracted with Phoenix1, instead competing on an unofficial trial basis spanning January 9 through January 30, when the entire roster departed. The player emphasized that neither party executed written agreements, creating ambiguity around exact payment expectations, though he anticipates receiving compensation for tournament successes achieved during his tenure.

My Phoenix1 Situation

Read: https://t.co/5neavPxTWQ

— King (@theKingFPS_) February 14, 2021

During the assessment period, the squad secured two notable tournament placements that demonstrated competitive potential. Phoenix1 management reportedly evaluated player performance metrics to determine appropriate contract terms and compensation structures. However, King opted to exit before the trial concluded, citing pursuit of superior competitive opportunities within the evolving Valorant esports landscape.

Throughout his Phoenix1 involvement, King accumulated $1,300 in combined tournament earnings. He asserts the organization directly collected prize distributions from event coordinators with the stated intention of subsequent player allocation, yet these funds remain undistributed months later.

“Despite multiple communication attempts with various organizational representatives regarding my compensation status, no resolution has materialized, leaving me without rightful earnings currently,” King stated in his public declaration.

Phoenix1 leadership has maintained complete silence regarding the compensation allegations, offering no public commentary or organizational perspective on the situation.

The original Phoenix1 establishment gained prominence through its League of Legends competitive division before undergoing complete rebranding as Sentinels in 2017. The contemporary Phoenix1 operating entity exists as a separate organizational structure, with no confirmed affiliation to the Sentinels franchise or its operational framework.

This situation highlights critical vulnerabilities within emerging esports ecosystems where players frequently compete without adequate contractual safeguards. Professional gamers should prioritize written agreements specifying payment terms, tournament revenue distribution procedures, and dispute resolution mechanisms before committing to competitive engagements.

Organizations building credibility in competitive gaming must establish transparent payment systems and maintain open communication channels with competitors. The absence of these foundational elements can severely damage brand reputation and player trust, essential components for sustainable esports growth.

For players navigating similar situations, documenting all communications, maintaining records of tournament performances and earnings, and seeking legal counsel when payments are delayed beyond reasonable timeframes represent crucial protective measures.

Action Checklist

  • Secure written contracts before competing, specifying all payment terms and distribution timelines
  • Document all tournament performances, earnings, and organizational communications
  • Establish clear communication channels with organization management regarding payment status
  • Seek legal consultation if payments exceed 30-day delay without reasonable explanation

No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Phoenix1 organization accused of not paying Valorant roster Phoenix1 organization faces payment dispute with Valorant players over tournament earnings and contract issues