Explaining tick rates in FPS games: Difference between 64 and 128 tick

The gaming community has been buzzing about Valorant’s implementation of 128-tick servers, highlighting why competitive players need to understand this crucial technical aspect. Tick rate knowledge transforms from nice-to-have information to essential gaming literacy for anyone serious about first-person shooters.

While often overlooked by casual players, every multiplayer title operates on a tick-based system that fundamentally shapes the gaming experience. Mastering this concept allows players to distinguish between skill issues and technical limitations, focusing their improvement efforts more effectively.

Server architecture forms the backbone of multiplayer gaming, with two primary approaches dominating the landscape. Games like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive utilize dedicated servers maintained by developers, providing consistent performance across matches. Alternatively, peer-to-peer systems leverage individual players’ machines as temporary hosts, a method historically used in titles like Destiny and various Call of Duty iterations.

The three-phase tick process represents the core computational cycle that determines game state accuracy:

• Collect incoming player data and events
• Perform calculations on that collection
• Send newly calculated data back to players

Completion of this cycle constitutes a single server tick, with the frequency of these cycles measured as the tick rate. This systematic approach ensures all game logic resolves consistently across all connected clients.

Server authority extends to critical gameplay determinations including shot registration accuracy, objective timing validation, and player position reconciliation. In high-stakes competitive environments, server responsiveness becomes non-negotiable for fair play.

Tick rate quantification measures update frequency in cycles per second, directly influencing gameplay fluidity. Valve’s CS:GO matchmaking servers operate at 64-tick, meaning players receive synchronized game state information 64 times each second.

Modern display technology frequently outpaces server capabilities, creating a performance gap that affects gameplay perception. Many competitive gamers utilize 144Hz monitors capable of displaying 144 visual updates per second, while simultaneously receiving only 64 authoritative game updates from servers. This discrepancy manifests through several noticeable issues that impact player experience.

Visual artifacts like screen tearing occur when monitor refresh cycles don’t align with server update delivery. The notorious ‘shot behind cover’ phenomenon emerges when client-side positioning diverges from server-side calculations due to update frequency limitations. General lag symptoms and input delay round out the common complaints associated with tick rate mismatches.

The subjective ‘game feel’ that players describe often traces back to tick rate performance characteristics. Smooth, responsive gameplay directly correlates with how efficiently servers process and distribute game state information. Titles with inadequate server infrastructure frequently struggle to maintain player engagement long-term.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive demonstrates how platform choice affects tick rate experience. Official matchmaking provides 64-tick servers, while third-party competitive platforms deliver enhanced performance.

• CSGO official matchmaking: 64-tick
• CSGO on FACEIT: 128-tick
• CSGO on ESEA: 128-tick

Valorant established a new competitive standard by implementing 128-tick servers across all official matchmaking, reducing registration inconsistencies.

• Valorant official matchmaking: 128-tick

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare illustrates how different game modes can vary significantly in tick rate allocation.

• COD multiplayer lobbies: 22-tick
• COD custom games: 12-tick

This tiered approach to server resources highlights how developers prioritize performance based on gameplay mode importance. Understanding these differences helps players make informed decisions about where to invest their gaming time, especially when preparing for competitive environments like those found in our Complete Guide to modern FPS tactics.

Competitive gamers should prioritize platforms offering higher tick rates when serious practice or ranking up matters. The difference between 64-tick and 128-tick becomes particularly noticeable during precise flick shots and rapid peeking maneuvers.

Hardware selection plays a crucial role in maximizing tick rate benefits. While 144Hz monitors provide visual smoothness, their advantage diminishes when server tick rates can’t keep pace. Network configuration optimization, including reducing bufferbloat and minimizing latency spikes, further enhances the tick rate advantages.

Common mistakes include assuming higher monitor refresh rates alone will improve gameplay accuracy. In reality, the server’s authoritative updates ultimately determine valid actions and outcomes. Another common error involves blaming personal performance without considering technical limitations inherent to the gaming platform.

For players transitioning between games, understanding tick rate differences helps manage expectations about gameplay feel. When exploring new titles like those covered in our Weapons Unlock guides, tick rate awareness informs expectations about responsiveness and registration consistency.

Advanced optimization involves matching your hardware capabilities with games that leverage those investments effectively. The relationship between server performance and client hardware creates a symbiotic system where bottlenecks at either end degrade overall experience.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Explaining tick rates in FPS games: Difference between 64 and 128 tick Understanding server tick rates and how they impact FPS gaming performance, accuracy, and competitive advantage