Why former CSGO pros are quitting Valorant to return to CSGO

Professional gamer Nicholas “nitr0” Cannella made gaming history by becoming the first elite competitor to test Valorant’s professional scene before making a strategic return to Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. His journey represents a critical case study in modern esports career navigation.

The significance of nitr0’s transition extends beyond individual career moves. When he rejoined Team Liquid’s CSGO division, it signaled potential shifts in the competitive landscape that aspiring professionals should carefully consider.

Financial motivations drive most cross-game migrations in esports. Established titles like CSGO maintain substantial economic advantages through larger prize distributions and more frequent competitive opportunities that directly impact player earnings.

Valorant’s relative youth as an esports title creates natural disparities in tournament infrastructure. Comparing premier 2021 events reveals CSGO’s Stockholm Major offered $2 million in prizes while Valorant Champions Tour allocated half that amount at $1 million. For nitr0 specifically, his total career earnings of $964,191.73 include only approximately 5% derived from his Valorant competitive period.

Beyond pure economics, gameplay heritage and community connections influence player loyalty decisions. Many CSGO professionals maintain competitive roots extending back to Counter-Strike 1.6 and Source versions from the early 2000s, creating deeper attachments than possible with Valorant’s brief competitive history.

Do CSGO players make more money than Valorant players?

Quantitative analysis confirms CSGO professionals access substantially greater earning potential through tournament prize mechanisms alone. The raw numbers demonstrate clear financial advantages for those competing in the established title.

During 2021, CSGO hosted fifteen separate tournaments featuring prize pools exceeding $250,000. Meanwhile, Valorant’s competitive calendar included just three events reaching this financial threshold, creating significantly different opportunity landscapes for competitors.

Expanding the analysis to include tournaments with $100,000 prize pools reveals even more pronounced discrepancies between the two ecosystems. This frequency disparity for high-value competitions represents a primary concern for professionals evaluating career options between games.

The tournament economics fundamentally influence player motivation and competitive engagement. Larger, more frequent prize distributions naturally encourage heightened participation and performance levels, particularly when funding originates from diverse sources beyond direct developer support.

Third-party organizational involvement drives much of this economic contrast. While Riot Games primarily finances Valorant’s competitive structure through centralized control, Valve’s more decentralized approach with CSGO encourages independent tournament organizers to create additional earning channels.

Statistical comparisons highlight the scale difference in third-party tournament support. CSGO benefited from four separate $1 million events sponsored by organizations like BLAST and Intel during the comparison period. Contrastingly, Valorant’s Red Bull Home Ground #2 featured a considerably smaller $68,663 prize allocation.

Examining actual earnings data reinforces the prize pool disparities. Professional statistics indicate nitr0 earned $477,850 during his peak CSGO year in 2019, while his Valorant competitive period in 2020 generated $47,300 in tournament winnings – approximately one-tenth of his CSGO peak earnings.

Organizational salaries provide additional compensation streams that partially offset prize money differences. While nitr0’s $47,300 Valorant winnings were supplemented by his 100 Thieves contract, but for elite players capable of commanding top positions in either game, the prize differential remains substantial.

The potential for future Valorant prize pool growth exists, but current economic realities favor CSGO for professionals prioritizing maximum earnings potential. This financial landscape suggests potential migration patterns among top competitors seeking optimal financial returns.

For players considering similar transitions, several strategic factors warrant careful evaluation beyond immediate financial calculations.

Common Mistake: Underestimating the value of established connections and community integration in more mature esports ecosystems. Building reputation takes time, and switching games resets some of that social capital.

Practical Tip: Analyze not just current prize pools but tournament frequency and third-party support trends over multiple seasons before making transition decisions.

Gameplay mastery transfer varies significantly between titles. While both are tactical shooters, CSGO’s movement mechanics, spray patterns, and economic systems differ significantly from Valorant’s ability-based gameplay structure.

Optimization Strategy: Consider hybrid approaches where players maintain skills in both games during transition periods, similar to how some professionals manage multiple character specializations in class-based shooters, maintaining flexibility while testing new competitive environments.

The timing of game transitions critically impacts career trajectory. Early adopters in new esports titles may secure valuable organizational spots but face uncertain competitive landscapes and prize distributions.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Why former CSGO pros are quitting Valorant to return to CSGO Analyzing the financial realities and career decisions between CSGO and Valorant esports professionals