TL;DR
- Carlos Ocelot resigned after posting a controversial video with Andrew Tate that sparked massive community backlash
- Reports suggest Riot Games may have pressured G2 to remove Ocelot to maintain their LEC partnership
- Riot’s EMEA esports head has publicly denied any involvement in the resignation decision
- The incident highlights growing tensions between esports personalities and corporate governance standards
- G2’s Valorant partnership loss and potential LEC slot concerns created significant business pressure
What initially appeared as another social media firestorm quickly escalated into one of esports’ most significant leadership crises. The Carlos Ocelote-Andrew Tate situation seemed resolved following his resignation as G2 CEO, but emerging reports indicate potential intervention from Riot Games in this pivotal organizational decision.
The polarizing public figure and former professional fighter Andrew Tate faced widespread platform bans across major social networks including Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. His digital footprint diminished to scattered clips on unofficial channels. Against this backdrop, Carlos’s victory celebration video featuring Tate following G2’s second-place LEC finish generated immediate negative reactions. What began as online criticism rapidly transformed into substantial professional repercussions.
G2’s chief executive Carlos Ocelote ultimately vacated his leadership position. While speculation circulated about G2’s exclusion from Riot’s Valorant partnership program being the catalyst, definitive explanations remained elusive. However, recent investigative findings indicate the initial theories might contain elements of truth.
Why did Carlos Ocelot step down from G2?
A clip showing Ocelote commemorating G2’s recent runner-up performance in the LEC gained viral attention as viewers spotted Andrew Tate enjoying a cigar beside the CEO. The footage triggered widespread condemnation, yet Ocelote reacted defensively, declining to express regret for socializing with someone he considered a personal acquaintance. Carlos subsequently issued an additional announcement, formally departing from his executive role at the organization.
His departure statement emerged following reliable information about G2’s elimination from Riot’s Valorant collaborative program. Supporters lacked concrete evidence initially, but Esportmaniacos reporter Yuste indicated that Riot might have formally required G2 to sever ties with Ocelote. Based on the investigation, the former chief executive divested his ownership shares in G2 following Riot’s stipulation that this was necessary to preserve their LEC position after the Valorant partnership termination.
Did Riot force Carlos to step down from G2?
Although Riot maintains official silence, the EMEA League of Legends esports director has publicly countered assertions of Riot’s participation in Carlos’s resignation choice. According to Maximilian Peter Schmidt, the examination of the Carlos matter continues actively, but LEC has refrained from direct intervention currently. He additionally clarified that Riot hadn’t contributed to Carlos’s executive departure in any capacity.
No.
— Maximilian Peter Schmidt (@RiotMAXtheX) September 26, 2022
Given the intensifying dispute, Riot might release a formal position statement. Carlos served as a fundamental architect behind G2’s remarkable competitive achievements, with the organization ranking as the highest-valued esports entity outside Los Angeles County per Forbes assessments. Because of his deep personal investment in competitive gaming, Carlos attracted an enormous dedicated following that supported G2 primarily due to the CEO’s charismatic leadership.
The uncertainty surrounding Riot’s potential influence on Carlos’s leadership exit persists, though Maximilian Schmidt maintains this interpretation might be inaccurate. Nevertheless, G2’s exclusion from the Valorant partnership program represents a notable development, particularly given the organization’s established prestige and industry relationships.
This incident establishes crucial precedents for how esports organizations manage executive conduct controversies. The delicate balance between personal expression and corporate responsibility becomes increasingly complex in an industry built around charismatic leadership. For teams navigating similar challenges, establishing clear social media guidelines and crisis management protocols becomes essential for protecting valuable gaming partnerships.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anyone following competitive gaming’s evolving landscape and the business realities that underpin professional esports operations.
Action Checklist
- Establish clear social media guidelines for executives representing partnered organizations
- Create rapid response protocols for managing community backlash
- Monitor evolving standards in esports governance and partnership requirements
- Review and understand the strategic implications explored in our comprehensive gaming industry analysis
No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Was Riot Games behind Carlos’ resignation from G2 Esports? Uncovering the truth behind Carlos Ocelot's G2 departure and Riot Games' potential involvement