TL;DR
- Top Esports faced credible food tampering threats from rival fans during 2020 LPL Summer Split
- Organizations must implement multi-layered security protocols for player protection
- Fan toxicity often escalates during high-stakes competitive seasons and roster changes
- Proactive community management and legal action are essential deterrents
- Player safety protocols should include food delivery verification and social media monitoring

A disturbing escalation in esports fan behavior emerged when Chinese League of Legends enthusiasts threatened to contaminate Top Esports’ delivered meals with laxative substances through social media platforms. This incident represents one of the most extreme cases of player targeting in recent competitive gaming history.
Top Esports responded decisively by issuing an official organizational statement emphasizing their zero-tolerance policy toward threats against player welfare. The organization’s swift reaction demonstrated their commitment to maintaining secure competitive environments.
The individuals responsible for the initial threat circulated photographic evidence of a food delivery receipt allegedly connected to Top Esports. Management confirmed the receipt’s authenticity, triggering immediate protective measures. This verification process highlights the importance of threat assessment protocols in modern esports operations.
According to their public communication, Top Esports initiated law enforcement involvement and coordinated with the food delivery platform to enhance security verification procedures. Fortunately, no players or staff members experienced physical harm, suggesting the threats may have been primarily psychological warfare tactics.
The organization reiterated its fundamental commitment to employee safety assurance, pledging to implement strengthened protective frameworks moving forward. This proactive stance sets important precedents for how gaming organizations should handle security breaches.

League of Legends fans go to extremes in player harassment
While extreme fan behavior remains relatively uncommon in League of Legends, historical incidents across traditional sports demonstrate that competitor protection requires systematic prioritization. As the game’s global popularity expands, so does the intensity of fan engagement, particularly among the most emotionally invested supporters.
Passionate dedication frequently crosses into dangerous obsession, generating genuine hostility toward players and organizations. Understanding these behavioral patterns is crucial for developing effective intervention strategies.
The recent T1 organization experienced significant fan backlash following the strategic decision to bench legendary mid laner Lee “Faker” Sang-hyeok in favor of developing rookie talent Lee “Clozer” Ju-hyeon. Community reactions included intense criticism and direct personal attacks targeting T1 management and specific roster members.
Psychological research indicates that highly identified fans often experience “BIRGing” (Basking in Reflected Glory) when their team succeeds but may engage in hostile behavior following perceived organizational missteps. This phenomenon explains why roster changes frequently trigger disproportionate reactions.
The anonymity of the individuals threatening Top Esports remains unresolved, though evidence strongly suggests involvement from supporters of rival LPL teams competing for the 2020 Summer Split championship title. Competitive tension during playoff seasons often amplifies toxic fan behaviors, requiring enhanced security awareness during these periods.
Esports organizations globally are recognizing the necessity of comprehensive player protection programs that address both digital and physical security threats. The Top Esports incident represents a wake-up call for the entire competitive gaming ecosystem regarding vulnerability assessment and threat mitigation.
Historical precedents from traditional sports provide valuable lessons about fan management and security protocol development. The 1994 Monica Seles stabbing incident demonstrates how quickly fan obsession can turn violent, while European football’s history with hooliganism offers insights into managing competitive rivalries.
Effective security frameworks should incorporate multiple protective layers including verified food sourcing, transportation security, venue protection, and digital monitoring systems. Organizations must balance accessibility with security, maintaining fan engagement while ensuring competitor safety.
Preventive strategies include community education initiatives, clear codes of conduct enforcement, and collaboration with platform operators to identify threatening behavior patterns early.
Regular security audits and staff training ensure preparedness for potential incidents. The evolving nature of esports fandom requires adaptive security approaches that anticipate new threat vectors before they materialize into actual harm.
Establishing robust crisis management protocols enables organizations to respond effectively when threats emerge. This includes designated communication channels, legal consultation access, and media response templates that maintain organizational integrity during challenging situations.
Fan education programs that promote healthy engagement and clarify behavioral boundaries can significantly reduce toxicity incidents. Organizations should clearly communicate consequences for harassment while providing positive outlets for fan expression.
Legal preparedness involves understanding jurisdictional differences in threat classification and maintaining relationships with appropriate law enforcement agencies. Documentation procedures for threats ensure proper evidence preservation for potential legal action.
Regular security assessments should evaluate physical premises, digital presence, transportation arrangements, and personal protection needs. These evaluations must consider both immediate threats and long-term vulnerability reduction strategies.
Collaboration with other organizations and tournament operators creates industry-wide security standards that protect all competitors. Sharing threat intelligence and best practices strengthens the entire esports ecosystem against malicious actors.

Action Checklist
- Establish verified food delivery protocols with restaurant partners
- Implement social media monitoring for threat detection and early intervention
- Develop crisis communication templates for harassment incidents
- Conduct quarterly security audits addressing both digital and physical vulnerabilities
- Establish legal partnerships for rapid response to credible threats
No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Top Esports responds to fan threats of laxatives in players’ food Understanding esports fan toxicity, security protocols, and preventing player harassment incidents
