This Cypher bug got a team punished during VCT Champions

Riot Games has temporarily suspended Group A matches at the Valorant Champions Tour Berlin event to conduct a thorough review of their initial competitive ruling. The controversy stems from Vivo Keyd’s utilization of a game-breaking Cypher camera exploit that fundamentally altered match outcomes at the highest level of competitive play.

The Valorant Champions Tour’s culminating Berlin tournament, designed to crown the world’s top team following months of qualification events, has encountered significant operational challenges. A persistent bug that remained unresolved for months ultimately deprived Vivo Keyd of what appeared to be a crucial victory, forcing Riot to reconsider their adjudication process amid growing community scrutiny.

The problematic exploit involves Cypher’s surveillance camera on the Breeze map, specifically positioned at A site where it gathers extensive intelligence while remaining completely immune to enemy detection and destruction. This creates an overwhelmingly unfair tactical advantage since opposing players cannot eliminate the camera even when they identify its general location.

This specific camera placement bug initially gained attention during June professional matches between teams BREF and Vodafone Giants, where the latter strategically leveraged the exploit to secure competitive advantages. Months later during the first Valorant major tournament, professional player JhoW from Vivo Keyd deployed the identical Cypher camera technique across six separate rounds against Acend. Such exploitation directly contravenes Valorant’s competitive rule 7.2.6 governing fair play, placing Vivo Keyd in a precarious position despite their apparent match victory.

Tournament administrators remained unaware of the exploit utilization until after the match concluded with Vivo Keyd declared the winner. The delayed detection complicated the ruling process significantly, as post-match adjustments cannot fully replicate in-game decision-making dynamics. Understanding proper camera placements and their limitations is crucial for competitive integrity, which our Class Guide explores in depth for other tactical shooter contexts.

Following substantial community criticism and professional player feedback, Riot Games issued an official statement reversing the match outcome. The publisher transferred all six rounds where Vivo Keyd utilized the exploit to Acend’s scoreline, adjusting the final result from the original outcome to 12-9 in Acend’s favor. To compensate for the economic ramifications across those forfeited rounds, Riot awarded Acend one additional round, effectively stripping Vivo Keyd of their hard-fought victory.

While many community members supported this decision as necessary for competitive fairness, others questioned Riot’s prolonged failure to address the known exploit and the administrators’ decision to allow match continuation despite visible exploitation. According to Riot’s official blog clarification, the bug hadn’t been formally reported by participating teams nor was it sufficiently conspicuous to warrant immediate match suspension.

Since the initial ruling announcement, Riot has published additional updates postponing Group A matches indefinitely. The pending decision could dramatically alter upcoming matchups, including games involving Team Envy. Currently, Vivo Keyd awaits their loser’s bracket placement, but if Riot modifies their ruling, Acend might assume that position instead. For players looking to master competitive mechanics legitimately, our Complete Guide offers comprehensive strategic frameworks.

This incident underscores critical challenges in esports governance: balancing immediate tournament operations with long-term game integrity. Professional players operate in high-stakes environments where unexploited advantages can determine careers, while developers struggle with patch timelines that may not align with competitive schedules.

The controversy highlights several key esports administration considerations: the need for clearer exploit reporting protocols, more robust real-time monitoring systems, and standardized response frameworks for competitive rulings. Similar strategic considerations apply when exploring weapon systems, as detailed in our Weapons Unlock guide for competitive play.

Looking forward, the gaming community anticipates Riot will implement more systematic approaches to bug identification and resolution between major patches. The resolution of this case will likely establish precedents for handling similar situations in future Valorant tournaments and potentially influence other esports titles’ competitive rule sets.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » This Cypher bug got a team punished during VCT Champions Understanding the Cypher camera exploit controversy and Riot's competitive ruling at VCT Champions