s1mple explains why CS2 Premier still “sucks”

Following an extended hiatus after Counter-Strike 2’s launch, esports icon Oleksandr “s1mple” Kostyljev has resurfaced with a powerful critique that resonates throughout the competitive community. His absence from professional play coincided precisely with CS2’s debut, creating speculation about his true motivations.

While initial theories suggested his departure related to earlier comments about CS2’s playability issues, the reality appears more complex. The Ukrainian superstar’s recent social media commentary reveals deep concerns about fundamental security infrastructure rather than gameplay mechanics alone.

Through his X platform statement, the Counter-Strike legend articulated specific frustrations with CS2’s anti-cheat limitations while offering Valve concrete recommendations for improvement.

s1mple has a suggestion for CS2 anti-cheat

The competitive community widely acknowledges that CS2’s VAC Live anti-cheat demonstrates negligible advancement compared to its CSGO predecessor. With a completely new game release, players reasonably anticipated Valve would address the most persistent complaint in competitive FPS: rampant cheating.

However, veteran players expressed little surprise when CS2 launched featuring essentially the same underlying security architecture with updated branding. The practical distinctions between VAC Live and previous iterations remain virtually imperceptible within Premier mode, CS2’s flagship competitive environment.

Many professional competitors report encountering suspicious players in approximately one of every three high-level matches, creating an environment where skill-based competition becomes increasingly difficult to validate.

The esports champion concurs with community sentiment about the current anti-cheat’s limitations.

“You need to understand CS2 that without proper anti-cheat — Premier f—ing sucks, no one gonna grind for rating like in Valorant, easiest way — connect with FaceIT anti-cheat, hardest way — create much better one,” s1mple stated emphatically.

In his detailed assessment, the professional athlete contrasted CS2’s situation with Valorant’s successful implementation, emphasizing that dedicated players lack motivation to pursue ranking progression when cheaters compromise competitive integrity regularly.

Valve possesses two viable pathways according to s1mple’s analysis: establish a technical partnership with FACEIT’s proven anti-cheat system, or undertake the more challenging development of a fundamentally superior proprietary solution. The gaming corporation could immediately address this pressing issue through FACEIT collaboration, which the pro identifies as the more expedient option.

Within his social media commentary, the elite competitor systematically compared CS2’s competitive landscape to Valorant’s established model. He explained that motivation to achieve higher rankings diminishes significantly when illegitimate players disrupt matches frequently.

CS2’s ranking mechanism shares structural similarities with Valorant’s approach, presenting progression through numerical ratings that create tangible competitive milestones. Premier mode inherently feels more competitive due to this visible progression system.

Nevertheless, hackers systematically erode the enjoyment and competitive purity that should define high-level play. The psychological impact extends beyond individual matches, creating systemic distrust that undermines the entire competitive ecosystem.

Professional players particularly struggle with maintaining motivation when questionable performances potentially indicate cheating rather than legitimate skill advancement.

Valve maintains silence regarding s1mple’s forceful critique, though historical patterns suggest his intervention may not prompt immediate action. Understanding Valve’s development philosophy, CS2 competitors should realistically expect to navigate the current anti-cheat environment for the foreseeable future.

The gaming corporation’s traditional approach favors methodical, long-term solutions over rapid reactive changes. This development temperament means meaningful anti-cheat enhancements typically emerge over extended timelines rather than immediate patches.

Community organizers recommend players document suspicious encounters systematically, report violations consistently through official channels, and participate in community-driven anti-cheat initiatives while awaiting official improvements.

For those seeking immediate relief, exploring third-party platforms with more robust security measures might provide temporary solutions, though this fragments the player base and doesn’t address the core issue.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » s1mple explains why CS2 Premier still “sucks” Professional CS2 player s1mple reveals critical anti-cheat concerns and proposes FACEIT partnership solution