Pokemon Go player “completes the game” but not everyone’s convinced

How a maxed-out Lucky Hundo Slaking sparked debate about what truly defines Pokemon Go completion

Understanding the Rarity: What Makes This Pokemon Special

The Pokemon Go community recently witnessed a fascinating debate when one trainer proudly showcased their ultimate achievement: a completely maxed-out Lucky Hundo Slaking that they claimed represented “completing the game.” This combination represents one of the rarest possible Pokemon configurations, blending three distinct rarity elements into a single creature.

Hundos, the community term for Pokemon with perfect 15/15/15 Individual Values (IVs), represent the statistical peak of any species. These creatures possess maximum potential in attack, defense, and stamina, making them highly sought after for both collection and combat purposes. When combined with the Lucky status—which halves stardust costs for power-ups—and the Best Buddy bonus that provides a combat boost, you have what many consider the pinnacle of Pokemon perfection.

The statistical probability of obtaining this specific combination through trading is exceptionally low. While lucky trades occur approximately 5% of the time with best friends, the chance of that lucky Pokemon also having perfect IVs adds another layer of rarity. This makes the showcased Slaking not just a powerful combatant but a statistical marvel that represents hundreds or thousands of trade attempts.

The Slaking Conundrum: Tank Powerhouse vs. PvP Liability

Slaking presents a unique case study in Pokemon Go meta-analysis. As one of the bulkiest normal-type Pokemon available, it boasts an enormous CP ceiling and substantial staying power in gym defense situations. Its high stamina and defense stats allow it to absorb significant damage while dealing respectable counter-attack damage through moves like Body Slam and Play Rough.

However, Slaking’s combat effectiveness suffers dramatically in player-versus-player scenarios. The Pokemon’s move pool limitations and slow energy generation make it poorly suited for the fast-paced, strategic demands of Go Battle League. This creates what experienced players call the “Slaking paradox”—a Pokemon that looks impressive on paper but delivers limited practical value in many competitive contexts.

The resource investment required to max out any Pokemon to level 50 represents a significant commitment. For Slaking specifically, trainers must weigh the 296 XL candy requirement and approximately 250,000 stardust (halved for Lucky status) against the Pokemon’s actual utility. Many veteran players argue these resources could be better allocated to meta-relevant Pokemon like Mewtwo, Dialga, or Melmetal that deliver consistent performance across multiple battle formats.

Community Reactions: From Skepticism to Celebration

The Pokemon Go community response highlighted deep divisions in how players define achievement and value. Critical voices questioned the practical wisdom of the investment, with one veteran trainer noting: “I’ve maintained my 2017 and 2018 Slakings at their original capture levels because I prioritize combat effectiveness over cosmetic CP displays. Having a functionally limited Pokemon as your highest CP representative seems counterproductive.”

Others pointed to the achievement’s context, noting that lucky trades—while statistically rare—don’t carry the same prestige as wild perfect catches. “The trading mechanic provides controlled opportunities for perfect IVs that diminish the accomplishment’s impressiveness compared to random wild encounters,” commented another community member who had obtained multiple trade hundos themselves.

Supportive perspectives celebrated the personal achievement aspect, with some trainers offering humorous praise. “Deploying this in Master League specifically to counter Giratina Origin teams would create wonderfully frustrating experiences for opponents,” one comment suggested. Another offered mock financial appreciation: “I’d seriously consider a dollar trade for that magnificent specimen.”

Pokemon Go: All Legendary Pokemon & how to catch them (2026)

Pokemon Go players divided as some refuse to collaborate in Max Battles

Pokemon Go player gets a “Christmas miracle” by catching rare Shiny Legendary with 1% battery

The debate expanded to include alternative skill benchmarks, with one player humorously suggesting that “landing excellent throws on elusive Zubats represents a more meaningful demonstration of mastery” than possessing rare Pokemon. This reflects how different player types prioritize various aspects of gameplay—from collection completeness to technical skill execution.

Strategic Insights: Maximizing Your Pokemon Go Investments

For trainers looking to optimize their resource allocation, several strategic principles can help avoid common investment pitfalls. First, always evaluate a Pokemon’s performance across multiple battle formats before committing substantial resources. A Pokemon that excels in gym defense but falters in PvP may not justify maximum investment unless it serves a specific strategic niche.

Common mistakes include over-investing in visually impressive but functionally limited Pokemon, neglecting type coverage in favor of raw stats, and failing to consider move pool limitations. Advanced players recommend maintaining a balanced roster that addresses various combat scenarios rather than focusing exclusively on CP maximization.

Optimization strategies for experienced trainers include prioritizing Pokemon with multi-format utility, focusing on species with beneficial typing against current meta threats, and strategically using lucky trades for resource-intensive power-ups. Remember that stardust and candy constraints mean every investment decision carries opportunity costs—resources spent on one Pokemon cannot be used on others.

The fundamental question of what constitutes “completing” Pokemon Go remains beautifully subjective. For some, it’s obtaining perfect specimens of their favorite species. For others, it’s achieving high rankings in competitive play or completing the Pokédex. The Slaking controversy ultimately demonstrates that personal achievement definitions vary as widely as the Pokemon themselves, and every trainer’s journey toward completion follows a unique path worth celebrating.

No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Pokemon Go player “completes the game” but not everyone’s convinced How a maxed-out Lucky Hundo Slaking sparked debate about what truly defines Pokemon Go completion