Player disqualified for cheating in VCT reveals they lied about gender

The competitive Valorant scene faces mounting integrity challenges as the VCT Game Changers tournament becomes embroiled in dual controversies involving both cheating software and identity misrepresentation.

Launched in 2021, Riot Games established the Game Changers program specifically to cultivate competitive opportunities for women and marginalized genders within the Valorant ecosystem. This initiative has successfully increased female participation rates in professional esports by over 60% according to industry tracking data. However, the specialized nature of this circuit creates inherent security risks that malicious participants can exploit.

The recent disqualification of EQ Cerise highlights how tournament structures designed for inclusion require robust verification systems to prevent exploitation. Similar to understanding Class Guide mechanics in tactical shooters, competitive integrity depends on thorough participant vetting.

During the North American VCT Game Changers open qualifier, teams EQ Cerise and CLG Red competed in a high-stakes Saturday match that would determine advancement opportunities. EQ Cerise initially secured victory through what appeared to be legitimate gameplay.

Riot Games’ competitive integrity team subsequently conducted a thorough investigation, discovering conclusive evidence of unauthorized third-party software usage. This led to the official overturning of EQ Cerise’s victory—a decision demonstrating Riot’s zero-tolerance approach to competitive cheating.

Professional esports organizations typically implement multiple layers of anti-cheat protection, including hardware fingerprinting, software monitoring, and behavioral analysis. The speed of Riot’s ruling suggests they employed advanced detection methodologies similar to those covered in our Weapons Unlock strategy guides for maintaining fair play standards.

Before the cheating allegations could be fully resolved, a more fundamental violation emerged. Player dsylexic, already under investigation for potential hacking, publicly admitted to deliberately falsifying a non-binary gender identity specifically to gain eligibility for VCT Game Changers competition.

The competitor revealed employing deceptive tactics to join EQ Cerise roster, acknowledging teammate Jenni’s assistance in facilitating the identity misrepresentation. However, dsylexic continued denying any competitive cheating occurred during actual tournament matches.

“I want to emphasize that nobody else at EQ Cerise knew that I was faking my non-binary status to play in Game Changers besides Jenni,” dsylexic stated in an official declaration. “I sincerely apologize to my teammates for lying about my non-binary status to play in Game Changers.”

This confession reveals critical vulnerabilities in esports verification systems. Tournament organizers must balance privacy concerns with eligibility confirmation—a challenge similar to implementing fair Complete Guide systems in competitive gaming environments where identity and skill verification intersect.

Following dsylexic’s stunning admission, teammate Jenni published her own TwitLonger statement acknowledging conscious participation in the identity deception scheme. She accepted responsibility for enabling unauthorized participation and announced her withdrawal from competitive Valorant play.

“Regarding the cheating allegations, I was made to believe dsylexic was not cheating prior to or during the matches in the tournament. However, with some of the tweets coming to light, I am not sure anymore,” Jenni confessed, indicating growing uncertainty about the full extent of competitive violations.

Jenni’s comments reference circulating social media evidence showing dsylexic possessing cheating software installations. The accused player claims these tools were discontinued long before the tournament and insists no cheating occurred during the crucial CLG Red match.

The VCT Game Changers program explicitly restricts participation to women and marginalized genders, meaning dsylexic’s identity misrepresentation alone warranted competitive ban regardless of cheating allegations. This situation mirrors the importance of understanding core game mechanics in any competitive title—whether mastering tactical positioning or verifying participant eligibility.

Riot Games has maintained its competitive ruling regarding the cheating violations, but the organization now faces additional disciplinary decisions concerning the identity fraud confession. The dual nature of these violations presents complex adjudication challenges for tournament organizers.

This incident underscores critical needs within competitive esports: implementing robust identity verification that respects privacy, developing tamper-proof anti-cheat systems, and establishing clear consequence frameworks for competitive integrity violations.

Professional gaming circuits must balance accessibility with security, ensuring inclusive environments remain competition-integrity focused. The gaming community now watches closely to see how Riot addresses these intertwined issues of identity misrepresentation and competitive cheating.

The resolution of this case will likely establish important precedents for how esports organizations handle complex eligibility and integrity challenges in specialized competitive circuits designed to promote diversity and inclusion within gaming ecosystems.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Player disqualified for cheating in VCT reveals they lied about gender VCT Game Changers cheating scandal exposes identity fraud and competitive integrity concerns in Valorant esports