Only 12 perfect Pick’Ems remain after the Worlds 2020 semifinals

TL;DR

  • Only 12 participants maintained perfect Pick’Em brackets entering the Worlds 2020 finals
  • Suning eliminated 181 perfect brackets by defeating tournament favorites Top Esports
  • The LPL third seed’s underdog run mirrors historic esports upsets like Taipei Assassins
  • Strategic unpredictability and youth-driven playstyle defined Suning’s championship path
  • The final outcome would determine Worlds 2020’s predictability ranking in tournament history

As the 2020 League of Legends World Championship reaches its climax, a mere dozen competitors retain flawless Pick’Em brackets heading into the grand finals.

This year’s global tournament has delivered exceptional narratives and competitive drama, with DAMWON Gaming and Suning emerging as the final contenders for the Summoner’s Cup. This championship conclusion means the ultimate Pick’Em predictions remain unsettled, with these twelve individuals positioned to achieve gaming’s rarest accomplishment.

Before the semifinal clash between Suning and Top Esports, 193 participants maintained perfect bracket predictions. Suning’s stunning victory against the favored LPL champions decimated that number by 94%, leaving only the most prescient forecasters in contention.

These remaining twelve contestants now compete for the coveted Alienware Aurora Battlestation grand prize. Riot Games had established a maximum prize limit of fifteen units, though the current count ensures they won’t reach that threshold. With such limited numbers, unanimous agreement on the finals outcome appears improbable. The championship result will ultimately determine whether this becomes the most accurately predicted Worlds event in modern esports.

Suning’s Path of Destruction Through Pick’Em Brackets

While the 2020 championship initially appeared more predictable than recent tournaments, Suning systematically dismantled conventional wisdom at every stage. The LPL’s third-seeded representative astonished global audiences by dominating Group A against established powers like G2 Esports, then continued their improbable journey by defeating domestic rivals JD Gaming and tournament favorites Top Esports in knockout rounds.

Throughout their championship campaign, Suning consistently entered matches as statistical underdogs, a pattern that extends to the grand finals. This outsider status perfectly suits the young squad’s competitive approach, allowing them to execute their distinctive strategies without the burden of championship expectations weighing on their developing careers.

Should Suning capture the Summoner’s Cup, their achievement would stand among esports’ most remarkable underdog narratives. The closest historical parallel remains Taipei Assassins’ legendary 2012 championship run, where another underestimated team defied predictions to claim League of Legends’ ultimate prize.

Suning’s tournament performance represents a case study in competitive evolution. Beginning as regional dark horses, they transformed into global contenders through strategic innovation and fearless play. Their journey demonstrates how tournament formats can produce unexpected champions when teams peak at the perfect moment.

The 2012 Taipei Assassins comparison reveals fascinating parallels: both teams entered as third seeds, developed unique meta interpretations, and defeated more celebrated opponents through coordinated teamfighting and objective control.

What distinguishes Suning’s narrative is their youth-driven roster construction. With an average age significantly below tournament norms, they represent esports’ next generation arriving ahead of schedule.

Professional analysts struggled to forecast Suning’s success due to several strategic factors. Their flexible draft philosophy allowed adaptation to any opponent’s strategy, while their jungle-centric early game created unpredictable pressure points across the map.

The team’s willingness to prioritize objective control over traditional laning advantages disrupted conventional prediction models. Their teamfighting coordination, particularly in disadvantaged situations, demonstrated a level of synergy that statistics couldn’t adequately capture during the group stages.

For Pick’Em participants, Suning represented the ultimate bracket-buster because their growth trajectory accelerated throughout the tournament rather than following predictable development patterns.

Understanding these dynamics can improve future prediction strategies. Rather than relying solely on past performance metrics, successful forecasters must account for team evolution potential and meta adaptation capabilities.

Action Checklist

  • Analyze team progression patterns throughout tournaments, not just initial form
  • Research regional meta developments and international adaptation capabilities
  • Evaluate roster synergy and communication in high-pressure scenarios
  • Monitor underdog teams showing strategic innovation and growth potential

No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Only 12 perfect Pick’Ems remain after the Worlds 2020 semifinals How Suning's unexpected Worlds 2020 run shattered Pick'Em predictions and created esports history