TL;DR
- LGD Gaming jungler Condi received 18-month competitive ban for gambling on his own matches
- Player admitted betting on LGD to win but denied match-fixing allegations
- Team manager Hesitate banned for life amid blackmail and influence allegations
- Two academy players also terminated as scandal reveals systemic organizational issues
- Case highlights critical need for robust esports integrity protection systems
The League of Legends Pro League (LPL) has imposed a significant competitive suspension on Xiang “Condi” Ren-Jie, the primary jungler for LGD Gaming. This disciplinary action spans 18 months and remains effective through the conclusion of December 2020, effectively removing him from professional competition during this period.
During official proceedings, Condi acknowledged breaching the LPL’s strict anti-gambling regulations by placing wagers on match outcomes where he participated directly. Investigators suspect these violations occurred during qualification tournaments for the prestigious Demacia Cup, where Condi allegedly backed his own team to secure victory.
This situation presents a complex ethical dilemma in esports – while traditional match-fixing typically involves intentional underperformance, betting on one’s own team to win creates different competitive integrity concerns.
In his formal response to the allegations, Condi maintained a clear distinction between his actions and deliberate match manipulation. “I consistently competed with maximum effort in every contest and never attempted to deliberately lose any game,” the professional jungler stated. “My competitive mindset remained exclusively focused on achieving victory throughout all matches.”
The competitive psychology behind this scenario reveals intriguing dynamics. When athletes wager on their own success, it can paradoxically enhance motivation rather than undermine performance, creating a distinct violation category from traditional match-fixing schemes.
Condi further disclosed that an unidentified individual attempted to coerce him into authentic match-fixing. Initially, speculation pointed toward team manager Song “Hesitate” Zi-Yang, though Condi later clarified this initial assumption was incorrect. The blackmail attempt involved financial incentives for intentionally losing matches, which Condi rejected and subsequently reported to league authorities.
The scandal’s repercussions extended dramatically to LGD’s management structure. Song “Hesitate” Zi-Yang, the organization’s League of Legends manager, received a permanent ban from all competitive League of Legends activities. The specific grounds for this lifetime prohibition remain partially undisclosed as investigations continue.
LGD Gaming released an official declaration through their Facebook channels confirming the termination of both individuals’ contracts. The statement explicitly noted that Hesitate “engaged in repeated inappropriate conduct compromising competitive fairness and attempted to leverage his organizational position to manipulate match outcomes.”
The controversy deepened with the dismissal of Tang “1ntruder” Sheng and Fu “Fdy” Ding-Yuan from LGD’s academy roster. These additional terminations strongly indicate systemic integrity issues permeating multiple tiers of the gaming organization.
LGD has committed to implementing strengthened internal review processes and maintaining an absolute zero-tolerance approach toward any behaviors threatening competitive authenticity. Uncertainty persists regarding potential organizational penalties or additional individual sanctions beyond those already announced.
Condi’s competitive legacy includes a notable fourth-place achievement at the 2017 World Championship while competing with Team WE. This background makes his current situation particularly striking given his previous high-level competitive success.
This incident underscores critical vulnerabilities in esports governance frameworks. Organizations must develop comprehensive player protection systems to prevent similar integrity breaches. Implementing robust ethical guidelines and regular integrity training can help protect both players and competitive ecosystems.
Professional gaming entities should establish clear compliance protocols that include anonymous reporting mechanisms and independent oversight committees to ensure competitive fairness.
Action Checklist
- Implement mandatory anti-gambling education for all players and staff
- Establish anonymous reporting systems for integrity concerns
- Conduct regular financial transaction monitoring for competitive personnel
- Develop clear escalation protocols for handling integrity violations
No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » LGD Condi receives 18-month ban after alleged match fixing in China LGD Gaming's Condi receives 18-month esports ban for gambling violations while denying match-fixing allegations