TL;DR
- Griffin parted ways with coach cvMax weeks before Worlds 2019 as LCK’s second seed
- cvMax built Griffin from Challengers to three consecutive LCK finals through innovative strategies
- The coach’s ‘gladiator mentality’ approach created documented player distress and controversy
- Open booth recordings revealed concerning coaching methods affecting player psychology
- The timing creates uncertainty about Griffin’s Worlds performance and team stability
The LCK’s Griffin organization made a shocking roster move by terminating head coach Kim “cvMax” Dae-ho’s contract mere weeks before the 2019 League of Legends World Championship tournament.
On September 26, Griffin issued an official declaration via Twitter acknowledging the coach’s contributions and confirming their separation.
“To facilitate Griffin’s evolving direction, we’ve mutually agreed to conclude our agreement with coach Kim Dae-Ho (cvMax). We extend genuine appreciation for cvMax’s dedication to Team Griffin. Our thanks,” the organization communicated through their Twitter platform.
Griffin Coaching Crisis: Analyzing cvMax’s Departure Before Worlds 2019
This unexpected development stunned the esports community given its critical timing. Griffin enters Worlds 2019 representing Korea as the LCK’s second qualifying team. The squad initially joined Korea’s premier League of Legends competition during the 2018 LCK summer split following an undefeated campaign in Challengers Korea.
Throughout Griffin’s remarkable ascent from the Challenger series to LCK prominence, cvMax served as the strategic architect. His inventive tactical approaches transformed a roster of inexperienced players into three successive LCK championship finalists. Despite consistent regular season excellence, Griffin couldn’t convert their competitive superiority into championship victories.
cvMax frequently emphasized that team chemistry between athletes and coaching personnel represented Griffin’s fundamental success component. The coach maintained that optimal performance emerged when the organization functioned cohesively with inclusive decision-making processes.
Professional gaming analysts noted cvMax’s distinctive drafting patterns and early-game strategies that frequently caught established teams unprepared. His willingness to innovate with unconventional champion selections became a hallmark of Griffin’s identity in the LCK.
However, Griffin’s environment contained significant challenges beneath the surface success. During a 2018 discussion with Inven Global, cvMax confessed to employing particularly stringent methods with players following LCK defeats. He characterized his coaching methodology as cultivating a “warrior’s competitive mindset.”
Following that conversation, community members questioned whether cvMax’s methods crossed into player mistreatment territory, though confirmation remained elusive until the LCK transitioned to LoL Park. At the new competitive venue, teams utilize transparent booths between matches for tactical discussions. Multiple instances documented cvMax visibly reprimanding players on broadcast. Among the season’s most concerning visuals involved rookie top laner Choi “Doran” Hyeon-joon visibly emotional at his workstation preceding a match versus SK Telecom T1.
Sports psychology experts suggest that high-pressure coaching approaches can create either performance breakthroughs or significant player trauma, depending on individual resilience and support systems.
The trajectory for Griffin at LoL Worlds 2019 remains uncertain following this coaching transition. Removing cvMax might potentially alleviate player stress and enable enhanced international competition performance. Alternatively, the sudden leadership vacuum could produce more damaging consequences for team coordination and strategic preparation.
World Championship tournaments represent immense pressure environments where coaching stability typically provides critical strategic advantages. Teams facing internal turmoil during the preparation phase often struggle with adaptation against international opponents with established systems.
Professional esports organizations frequently face difficult decisions balancing coaching effectiveness against player welfare, with Griffin’s situation highlighting how timing amplifies these challenges exponentially.
Action Checklist
- Assess immediate team morale and identify key concerns
- Implement interim coaching structure with clear communication channels
- Develop psychological support systems for players under tournament pressure
- Create strategic contingency plans for Worlds preparation
No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Griffin parts ways with coach cvMax ahead of LoL Worlds 2019 Analyzing Griffin's coaching crisis and its impact on their 2019 Worlds performance