Former CoD developer reveals transparency solution to improve SBMM perception and player experience
The SBMM Reality Check: Why It’s Here to Stay
Skill-based matchmaking represents a permanent fixture in modern gaming ecosystems, despite ongoing player debates. The system’s fundamental architecture ensures competitive balance, though one of its original architects has identified crucial improvement opportunities.
The technical lead behind Call of Duty’s Matchmaking Rating algorithm confirms SBMM’s essential role while proposing straightforward enhancements. Charlie Olson, former Raven Software developer, emphasizes that complete removal would undermine the gaming experience for most players while offering concrete solutions to address common frustrations.
Activision’s January 2024 transparency report officially verified that performance metrics including eliminations, defeats, victories, and match outcomes directly influence lobby placement decisions. This systematic approach traces back to Call of Duty 4’s multiplayer infrastructure in 2007, establishing a long-standing foundation for competitive matchmaking.
The Matchmaking Rating (MMR) serves as the core algorithmic component determining player skill assessment and appropriate lobby assignments. Recent policy changes in January 2025 enabled players to request their hidden MMR values, though this information remains largely inaccessible through standard game interfaces.
During extensive discussions with Insider Gaming, Olson detailed specific strategies to transform player perceptions about skill-based matchmaking systems. His insights stem from direct involvement in developing the underlying rating architecture that powers modern matchmaking.
The Core Problem: Lost Sense of Progression
Matchmaking Ratings undergo continuous recalibration based on in-game performance metrics, creating dynamic skill assessments. This means consecutive underperforming matches can temporarily place you against opponents with comparatively lower MMR scores, though the system quickly adjusts to reflect actual skill levels.
Olson identifies the fundamental design flaw: “The critical issue with contemporary SBMM implementations involves the complete obscurity of competitive standings. Players lose tangible progression feedback, diminishing the sense of accomplishment and mastery development. Statistical performance indicators become less meaningful, kill-death ratios lose their comparative value, and this represents a significant design challenge that impacts player satisfaction.”
This transparency deficit creates psychological barriers where players cannot contextualize their performance within the broader competitive landscape. Without clear tier visibility or ranking indicators, matches feel arbitrarily challenging rather than progressively difficult, undermining the core reward mechanisms that drive engagement in competitive gaming.
The Simple Solution: Transparency and Visibility
To address SBMM’s perception challenges, the former Call of Duty developer proposes straightforward interface enhancements. “Players should receive clear indications about their lobby’s approximate skill level, perhaps through tier classifications like gold rank with corresponding experience point multipliers around 1.2x. This creates immediate feedback about match difficulty while providing appropriate rewards for challenging engagements.”
“Your Matchmaking Rating should display directly within combat record screens without requiring formal data requests to Activision support teams. This fundamental visibility empowers players to understand their competitive positioning and track skill development over time,” Olson elaborated during the interview.
The developer acknowledged presenting this concept multiple times during his tenure, though the suggestions faced organizational resistance. Implementation hurdles included his non-designer role creating advocacy challenges, combined with limited designer familiarity regarding MMR technical operations.
Black Ops 7 devs reveal players are actually choosing SBMM playlist more
Warzone is nerfing SBMM in Season 1 but players aren’t convinced
Black Ops 7 streamers convinced SBMM is as strong as ever despite changes
Olson further explained: “Most game designers lack deep technical understanding of Matchmaking Rating algorithms, creating discomfort when considering MMR integration into gameplay systems. This knowledge gap represents a significant barrier to implementing more transparent matchmaking features.”
Enhanced system transparency would immediately resolve confusion about competitive standings while providing concrete benchmarks for skill improvement. Understanding exactly how you compare against the broader player base transforms the matchmaking experience from mysterious to measurable.
Why Removing SBMM Isn’t the Answer
Despite vocal community demands for SBMM elimination, Olson provides data-driven reasoning for its necessity. Some players argue the system unfairly penalizes skill improvement by consistently matching against tougher opponents, though complete removal would create more significant problems.
“Internal analytics indicate approximately 50% of players would discontinue playing without skill-based matchmaking protections. The common ‘sometimes you dominate, sometimes you get dominated’ experience only applies to roughly 40% of intermediate skill players. The top 10% of elite performers account for nearly 90% of one-sided matches against less skilled opponents,” according to Insider Gaming’s reporting of Olson’s analysis.
This statistical reality underscores why publishers maintain SBMM systems despite community criticism. Protecting newer and less experienced players from repeated frustrating matches ensures broader player retention, even if it creates challenges for highly skilled competitors seeking more varied experiences.
Practical Strategies for SBMM Navigation
Understanding SBMM mechanics enables strategic approaches to manage your matchmaking experience. Rather than fighting the system, smart players learn to work within its parameters while advocating for improved transparency.
Performance Management Techniques: Recognize that MMR fluctuates based on recent performance. If you’re experiencing consistently challenging matches, consider playing more conservatively for several games to slightly lower your rating before returning to aggressive playstyles. This creates natural difficulty variation.
Mindset Adjustment: Reframe how you interpret competitive matches. Instead of viewing tough opponents as punishment, consider them opportunities to improve skills. The system intentionally matches you against players of similar capability to ensure fair competition.
Advanced Player Strategies: High-skill players should focus on consistent performance rather than sporadic dominance. The MMR system responds to sustained performance levels, so maintaining steady stats creates more predictable matchmaking outcomes. Consider creating alternate accounts for experimental playstyles without affecting your primary MMR.
Avoiding Common Mistakes: Don’t intentionally perform poorly to manipulate MMR—this often backfires by placing you in matches far below your skill level, creating boring gameplay. Instead, focus on gradual improvement and understanding that occasional challenging matches indicate your skills are developing appropriately.
For additional context, explore comprehensive analyses regarding SBMM controversies and community calls for systematic changes across various gaming platforms.
No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Former Call of Duty SBMM developer offers solution to improve controversial system Former CoD developer reveals transparency solution to improve SBMM perception and player experience