Doublelift says TSM founder Regi made his players cry

The esports community remains captivated by retired AD Carry Peng “Doublelift” Yilang’s explosive revelations about TSM founder Andy “Reginald” Dinh’s conduct. What began as personal grievances has evolved into a comprehensive examination of organizational leadership in professional gaming.

Doublelift initiated this public discourse through detailed streaming sessions where he methodically outlined his negative experiences spanning multiple seasons with TSM. His initial focus on the contentious 2020 offseason has since broadened into systemic criticism of Reginald’s management approach.

In subsequent broadcasts, the former pro player amplified his accusations, detailing patterns of bullying behavior and inappropriate operational interference. He painted a concerning portrait of deteriorating team dynamics whenever Reginald became directly involved in roster decisions.

According to Doublelift’s detailed accounts, Reginald consistently inserted himself into LCS playoff preparations, often with detrimental effects on player performance. The TSM founder’s presence reportedly created an atmosphere of tension and anxiety among competitors.

Doublelift characterized Reginald as exploiting his founder status to justify problematic behavior that would otherwise face professional consequences. He specifically identified fellow professionals Jesper “Zven” Svenningsen, Alfonso “Mithy” Rodriguez, and Dennis “Svenskeren” Johnsen as additional recipients of similar mistreatment.

Why are Doublelift and Reginald fighting?

The retired player maintains that Reginald coercively influenced his retirement decision against his competitive aspirations. He expressed strong criticism of what he describes as excessive micromanagement permeating TSM’s operational framework.

Throughout his extensive commentary, Doublelift emphasized that his fundamental concerns extend beyond his personal retirement circumstances. He consistently identifies Reginald’s behavioral patterns as the core issue, repeatedly describing him as possessing egomaniacal tendencies.

Doublelift asserts that Reginald fundamentally fails to demonstrate basic professional respect toward team members. He described specific instances where the TSM founder’s actions systematically undermined player confidence and self-worth.

The full-time streamer indicated that numerous competitors have experienced similar disrespect and psychological distress resulting from Reginald’s operational meddling. In his concluding remarks, Doublelift clarified that his criticisms encompass Reginald’s conduct far beyond the 2020 offseason timeframe.

He expressed regret for initially framing his public statements around retirement circumstances, suggesting this inadvertently narrowed the perceived scope of his legitimate concerns about organizational leadership.

Despite Reginald issuing an initial public response addressing Doublelift’s original comments, neither he nor TSM has formally reacted to the expanded allegations presented in subsequent streams. This silence has fueled community speculation and intensified scrutiny of the organization’s internal practices.

The escalating situation highlights critical questions about accountability structures within esports organizations and the professional standards expected of leadership figures in the rapidly evolving industry.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Doublelift says TSM founder Regi made his players cry Understanding the TSM controversy: Doublelift's bullying allegations against Reginald explained