TL;DR
- Team Liquid established early bottom lane dominance through precise 2v2 engagements
- Strategic dragon control and map pressure created insurmountable gold advantages
- Superior team fighting execution prevented 100 Thieves from staging comebacks
- Baron Nashor secure demonstrated superior objective timing and coordination
- The match revealed critical lessons about scaling compositions and early game priorities

Team Liquid solidified their position as LCS frontrunners with a commanding performance against a revamped 100 Thieves roster. This victory established clear separation at the top of the standings while demonstrating championship-caliber coordination.
The community eagerly anticipated this clash between defending champions Team Liquid and a substantially rebuilt 100 Thieves lineup. This marked the inaugural LCS stage confrontation between Yiliang “Doublelift” Peng and two-time world champion Bae “Bang” Jun-sik, creating compelling narrative stakes beyond the standings implications.
During champion selection, 100 Thieves unveiled unexpected strategies with Kim “Ssumday” Chan-ho locking in Yorick for the top lane while Bang opted for Viktor in the bottom lane position. These unconventional picks suggested a calculated approach to disrupt Liquid’s established game plan through lane-specific advantages.
As predicted, the action ignited in the bottom lane where Doublelift secured first blood at the six-minute mark during an intense 2v2 skirmish. This early advantage enabled Jake “Xmithie” Puchero to claim the initial infernal drake uncontested, establishing crucial map control.
Jungler Andy “AnDa” Hoang attempted to create breathing room for 100 Thieves with a top lane gank, but Liquid immediately countered with another bottom lane offensive that further extended Doublelift’s lead over Bang.
The bottom lane priority created cascading advantages across the map, allowing Liquid to control vision and dictate the tempo of engagements. This early lane dominance strategy is reminiscent of principles discussed in our Class Guide regarding role specialization and lane assignment optimization.
Both organizations adopted more measured approaches during the mid-game phase, focusing primarily on securing neutral map objectives. However, this conservative strategy proved insufficient for 100 Thieves, who already faced significant gold and item deficits that limited their engagement options.
100 Thieves attempted to secure isolated picks to reverse their fortunes, but Team Liquid consistently demonstrated superior team fighting coordination and target selection.
The gold differential created compounding advantages for Liquid, who efficiently converted their lead into permanent map pressure. Understanding these mid-game transition principles is crucial for mastering competitive play, as detailed in our Complete Guide to advanced strategic concepts.
A desperate 100 Thieves maintained aggressive positioning despite their disadvantages. When Team Liquid shifted focus toward Baron Nashor, 100 Thieves successfully disrupted the attempt, creating a potential steal opportunity that Xmithie ultimately secured for Liquid to effectively conclude the contest.
100 Thieves failed to properly scale their composition while Team Liquid demonstrated clear superiority in execution. This victory marked another successful defense by Doublelift against imported bottom lane talent in the North American competitive landscape.
The Baron secure exemplified championship-level objective control timing, where teams must balance risk assessment with potential game-ending rewards. These high-stakes decision moments separate elite teams from contenders, similar to end-game scenarios covered in our Weapons Unlock guide regarding optimal loadout selection.
This match revealed critical lessons about draft phase preparation and early game execution. Teams must balance innovative picks with reliable scaling options while establishing clear win conditions during the selection process.
The most common mistake observed was 100 Thieves’ inability to convert their unconventional draft into tangible early advantages. Successful teams recognize that unusual picks require specific game plans to maximize their potential impact.
Advanced players should focus on objective sequencing—understanding when to prioritize dragons, heralds, or turrets based on team composition strengths and current game state.
The 25-30 minute timeframe represents the critical decision window where teams must either accelerate their advantage or stall for scaling opportunities.
Action Checklist
- Establish bottom lane priority through coordinated 2v2 engagements
- Time dragon attempts with successful lane skirmishes to secure objectives uncontested
- Convert early advantages into vision control and map pressure
- Practice objective sequencing based on team composition strengths
No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Doublelift protects his throne, Liquid dominate 100 Thieves Team Liquid's strategic dominance over 100 Thieves reveals essential League of Legends team coordination principles
