CSGO teams are working with banned coaches after ESIC verdict

The Esports Integrity Commission’s landmark decision to sanction multiple coaches for spectator bug exploitation has created significant controversy across the Counter-Strike: Global Offensive competitive landscape. Despite clear violations of competitive integrity, several prominent organizations have chosen to maintain relationships with their disciplined coaching staff, raising fundamental questions about accountability in professional esports.

The comprehensive investigation into the coaching bug exploit commenced immediately after official Michal Slowinski brought the issue to light. ESIC’s preliminary findings resulted in 37 coaches receiving suspensions from competitive match duties. Following the esports regulatory body’s announcement, organizations including OG, Heroic, Boom, Hard Legion, ENCE, and AGO publicly declared continued support for their penalized coaches despite the confirmed infractions.

OG emerged as the first organization to publicly endorse Casper “ruggah” Due, who received a 3.75-month suspension for single-instance bug usage during his tenure with Dignitas. Boom’s coaching staff member Alessandro “Apoka” Marcucci similarly retained his position despite employing the exploit multiple times. Both coaches secured reduced penalties through full cooperation and confession during ESIC’s investigative process.

AGO likewise decided to maintain Mikołaj “miNIr0x” Michałków’s services following his 3.5-month suspension from competitive activities.

The severity of sanctions varied significantly based on violation frequency and cooperation levels. Coaches demonstrating immediate transparency and assisting investigators typically received substantially reduced penalties compared to those who attempted concealment or provided incomplete information.

Community Response to Coaching Decisions

While the competitive community generally supported OG’s decision given Ruggah’s immediate cessation after discovering the bug during an initial pistol round, Hard Legion’s unwavering support for coach Sergey “starix” Ischuk generated widespread condemnation across social media platforms and professional circles.

The Russian organization amplified controversy by publishing a war hero-themed tribute video announcing Starix’s continued involvement. This celebratory approach toward a confirmed rules violator drew sharp criticism from esports enthusiasts and industry professionals alike.

Cloud9’s general manager Henry “HenryG” Greer articulated widespread industry frustration through his social media commentary.

Feet up for 10 months and celebrated as a (war?) hero.

Dropped the ball on this one, lads.https://t.co/UlzqvZ6DqN

— C9 HenryG (@HenryGcsgo)September 29, 2020

While other squads await their coaches’ suspension conclusions, Heroic proactively transitioned Nicolai “Hunden” Petersen to analytical responsibilities following ESIC’s ruling. ENCE implemented similar measures, announcing recruitment for a new head coach while Slaava “Twista” Räsänen serves in analytical capacity.

Both Twista and Hunden faced severe sanctions of 15.75 and eight months respectively. These extended suspensions directly correlate with extensive exploitation across multiple competitive matches, demonstrating ESIC’s commitment to proportional disciplinary measures.

Technically, these organizational maneuvers don’t violate ESIC regulations, as penalties specifically prohibit coach-player interaction 15 minutes pre-match through conclusion. However, significant ethical concerns emerge regarding organizations providing analytical roles to individuals found guilty of competitive integrity violations.

Some of these orgs really are a joke, their coaches found guilty of using the bug, multiple times and with clear intent of gaining a competitive advantage and you simply move them to an “analyst” position? Seriously?

— Janko Paunovic (@YNk)October 1, 2020

Currently, ESIC has completed merely 20% of its comprehensive investigation into coaching misconduct. The commission plans to release the conclusive second portion of its investigative report during October 2020, potentially revealing additional violations and implementing further disciplinary actions.

The ongoing situation presents critical questions about long-term competitive integrity standards and organizational accountability. As the esports industry continues professionalization, establishing clear ethical boundaries becomes increasingly essential for maintaining spectator confidence and competitive fairness.

No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » CSGO teams are working with banned coaches after ESIC verdict Analyzing CS:GO coaching scandal fallout and ethical dilemmas in competitive esports organizations