TL;DR
- FACEIT’s anti-cheat has deeper system access than VAC, enabling better cheat detection
- CSGO’s Prime changes redirected hackers to third-party platforms like FACEIT
- Non-Prime players can access FACEIT but face stricter anti-cheat requirements
- Both systems have limitations and require ongoing updates to combat evolving cheats
- FACEIT remains popular despite recent challenges due to superior competitive experience

The competitive Counter-Strike ecosystem is experiencing a significant transformation, though not in the way most players anticipated.
Across gaming communities and social platforms, FACEIT participants are documenting noticeable increases in suspicious player encounters. This trend emerged following Valve’s substantial modifications to CSGO’s core matchmaking framework, specifically targeting security enhancements for users with Prime account status.
Valve recently implemented sweeping changes that restricted ranked matchmaking access and item distribution exclusively to Prime subscribers, establishing a $15 financial barrier for these premium features. The primary objective was creating an economic deterrent against cheating activities within the game’s most sought-after competitive modes.
However, CSGO already hosted numerous malicious actors before these adjustments. With standard ranked play now inaccessible to free account holders, cheat users appear to have migrated toward alternative competitive platforms such as FACEIT. Since FACEIT doesn’t enforce Prime status filtering, it provides comparable competitive experiences for players excluded from official ranked matchmaking.
FACEIT’s security system operates with elevated privileges on user systems, granting it comprehensive monitoring capabilities that significantly improve cheat software identification. In contrast, Valve’s Anti-Cheat (VAC) maintains more restrictive system permissions, limiting its effectiveness in detecting sophisticated cheating tools.
Despite its technical advantages, FACEIT’s protection mechanisms remain imperfect. Veteran competitors using platforms like FACEIT and ESEA frequently share experiences involving undetected cheaters infiltrating matches. The platform’s enhanced security framework has historically been a cornerstone of its appeal within the CSGO competitive community.
Key Technical Differences: FACEIT employs kernel-level drivers that monitor system calls and memory operations, while VAC primarily relies on signature scanning and heuristic analysis. This fundamental architectural distinction explains the variance in detection capabilities between the two systems.
Common Detection Limitations: Both systems struggle with hardware-assisted cheats and rapidly evolving bypass techniques. Advanced cheat developers frequently update their software to circumvent new detection methods, creating an ongoing technological arms race.
For players seeking the most secure competitive environment, understanding these technical distinctions is crucial when selecting their preferred platform.
Absolutely, Counter-Strike enthusiasts without Prime verification can participate in FACEIT matches. Following CSGO’s transition to free-to-play, FACEIT established protocols mandating that participants lacking Prime status, possessing minimal gameplay hours, or using recently created Steam accounts must utilize the platform’s proprietary anti-cheat client as a protective measure against higher-risk player profiles.
Access Requirements Breakdown: New accounts or those with limited gameplay history face mandatory anti-cheat installation. This policy aims to balance accessibility with security, ensuring competitive integrity while maintaining an open ecosystem.
Risk Management Strategy: By requiring enhanced security measures for potentially problematic accounts, FACEIT attempts to mitigate cheating risks without completely excluding non-Prime players.
Platform Comparison: Unlike official matchmaking, FACEIT provides competitive structure regardless of Prime status, though with additional security obligations for certain user categories.
Players should anticipate potential queue time variations based on their account status and security compliance, with non-Prime participants sometimes experiencing different matchmaking pools.
Looking ahead, FACEIT may develop specialized methodologies for flagging potentially problematic free accounts, enabling more targeted manual intervention against cheaters. The unexpected development of standard CSGO matchmaking becoming the premier competitive experience represents a surprising shift for veterans who traditionally sought superior gameplay elsewhere.
Platform Adaptation: Third-party services are continuously refining their detection algorithms and player verification processes. The competitive gaming landscape demands constant security evolution to maintain fair play standards.
Player Strategy Recommendations: Regular players should maintain updated anti-cheat clients and report suspicious behavior promptly. Community vigilance combined with technical solutions creates the most effective anti-cheat environment.
For comprehensive guidance on competitive gaming strategies beyond anti-cheat considerations, explore our Complete Guide to maximize your performance across different gaming platforms.
Action Checklist
- Install FACEIT’s anti-cheat client if you lack Prime status or have limited gameplay hours
- Verify your Steam account meets platform requirements before queuing
- Regularly update your anti-cheat software and report suspicious players
- Monitor social channels for platform security updates and policy changes
- Consider Prime status upgrade if you primarily play official matchmaking
No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » CSGO cheaters are moving to FACEIT after new Prime account rules Understanding FACEIT's anti-cheat advantages and Prime account requirements for CSGO competitive play
