Can the NA region and its LCS teams perform at Worlds 2020?

TL;DR

  • LCS teams possess strategic depth through controlled macro play that’s often misunderstood
  • North American innovation has directly influenced global meta trends like jungle Shen
  • The expanded format with 4 LPL/LEC teams increases overall competition levels
  • Best-of-one group stage format creates significant upset potential for underdog teams
  • Professional players and analysts believe LCS teams are significantly underestimated

North American League of Legends has consistently faced international skepticism, but the 2020 World Championship presents a unique opportunity to challenge these perceptions. While historical results show limited success, the current LCS representatives bring distinct strategic approaches that could prove surprisingly effective against global competition.

The common narrative positions LCS teams as inferior to other major regions, but this assessment fails to account for evolving playstyles and regional strengths that could translate well in tournament settings.

LCS teams might be better than people think

LCS underperformance has become embedded in esports culture, creating expectations that may not reflect current team capabilities. With Cloud9’s absence creating new leadership opportunities, Team SoloMid, Team Liquid, and FlyQuest must demonstrate that North American strategic approaches can compete at the highest level.

Recent international achievements provide important context for LCS potential. Cloud9’s 2018 semifinal run demonstrated that North American teams can advance deep in tournaments, while Team Liquid’s 2019 MSI performance against Invictus Gaming showed they can defeat world champions when executing their game plans effectively.

Current skepticism stems from perceived stylistic limitations, but professional players actively challenge these assumptions. FlyQuest’s WildTurtle and other competitors consistently emphasize that LCS teams possess the skill and strategic understanding to compete internationally.

In professional interviews, players express frustration with the gap between public perception and actual team strength, noting that criticism often overlooks specific regional advantages and preparation methods.

The most frequent critique centers on pacing differences, where LCS teams typically employ more methodical, controlled approaches compared to the aggressive styles favored by LPL and LEC representatives.

Strategic patience represents a legitimate competitive approach rather than a weakness, with expert analysts like LS consistently advocating for scaling compositions that maximize late-game effectiveness.

Kobbes talk about scaling is so laughable. Scaling doesnt mean being weak early. You can both scale and win lane, its how you draft. He also incorrectly asserts that offense is the only skillful aspect, and that somehow defending against offense isnt skill. Monored coinflipper

— LS (@LSXYZ9)
February 22, 2020

However, LCS teams demonstrate flexibility beyond their signature styles, with all three Worlds representatives capable of adapting their approaches based on opponent strengths and draft considerations.

Controlled macro play enables LCS teams to capitalize on opponent mistakes while minimizing their own errors, creating consistent performance patterns that can frustrate aggressive opponents. This methodical approach requires deep game understanding and disciplined execution, particularly in objective control and vision management.

Scaling composition mastery represents a particularly sophisticated strategic advantage, allowing teams to leverage champion power spikes and item timing advantages. Properly executed scaling strategies can neutralize early game aggression while creating overwhelming late-game advantages that are difficult to counter.

Innovation criticism against LCS teams has been directly contradicted by recent meta developments. TSM jungler Spica’s pioneering jungle Shen during the 2020 Summer Split playoffs demonstrated North American capacity for innovation, with the pick immediately being adopted by European teams and becoming a global tournament consideration.

The Shen innovation exemplifies how LCS teams can influence global meta trends, with the champion’s unique utility and global pressure creating new strategic dimensions for competitive play.

Strategic indecisiveness remains a legitimate concern in specific scenarios, particularly when facing opponents who excel at creating and capitalizing on tempo advantages.

Common strategic mistakes include over-prioritizing late-game scaling without establishing necessary early game foundations, or failing to adapt draft strategies to counter specific opponent strengths. Teams must balance their controlled approaches with proactive playmaking to avoid being overwhelmed by faster-paced opponents.

Advanced optimization involves understanding power spike timing windows and creating draft combinations that provide both early stability and late-game scaling potential.

The new format makes 2020 World Championship groups harder

Format modifications significantly increase competitive density, with LPL and LEC each receiving four qualification slots based on previous international performances. This expansion concentrates talent from the world’s strongest regions, raising the baseline skill level required for advancement.

The additional team representation from top regions creates group composition scenarios where LCS teams face multiple elite opponents simultaneously.

This structural change represents a primary source of fan skepticism regarding LCS prospects, despite affecting all participating regions equally in terms of increased competition.

Tournament difficulty has escalated to unprecedented levels, testing North American teams against the most concentrated talent pool in competitive League history.

Deep tournament runs remain mathematically plausible despite challenging circumstances, requiring teams to demonstrate consistent performance against elite competition throughout the event.

Group stage best-of-one format introduces significant volatility, where single-game performances can determine advancement regardless of overall team strength or historical performance.

Worlds tournaments historically feature unexpected results and underdog victories, with the 2020 edition likely to continue this tradition given the unpredictable nature of single-game matches.

The critical determining factor for LCS success involves converting individual upset victories into sustained performance sequences that carry through multiple stages of the competition.

Action Checklist

  • Analyze team-specific strategic patterns and adaptation capabilities
  • Evaluate draft flexibility and champion pool depth for each LCS representative
  • Assess group composition scenarios and potential upset opportunities
  • Monitor early game performance metrics to identify strategic execution quality

No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Can the NA region and its LCS teams perform at Worlds 2020? Analyzing LCS teams' underestimated potential and strategic advantages for the 2020 World Championship