TL;DR
- European dominance with North and Mousesports leading 3-0 qualifiers
- NRG Esports as sole non-European team in top five advancing groups
- Major upsets including Furia’s elimination and DreamEaters’ surprising success
- Regional impacts with CIS teams showing mixed results and Brazilian struggles
- Strategic implications for team rebuilds and Legends Stage preparations

The initial phase of the StarLadder Berlin Major has concluded, setting the stage for intense Legends Stage competition.
Sixteen teams entered the Challengers Stage, with exactly half advancing while the remaining eight saw their championship hopes end prematurely.
While many results aligned with pre-tournament predictions, several unexpected outcomes reshaped the competitive landscape dramatically.
Tournament Structure Insights: The Challengers Stage employed the Swiss System format, where teams must achieve three wins to advance or suffer three losses for elimination. This structure creates natural tension as teams approach qualification or elimination thresholds.
Strategic Consideration: Teams that started strong with 3-0 records avoided the pressure of elimination matches entirely.
StarLadder Berlin Major Challengers Stage Top Eight
European Counter-Strike demonstrated regional supremacy during the opening phase. North and Mousesports emerged as the first qualifiers with flawless 3-0 performances, showcasing dominant form in both best-of-one initial matches and decisive best-of-three qualification series against CR4ZY and G2 Esports respectively.
Both CR4ZY and G2 Esports recovered quickly from their initial setbacks, securing their Legends Stage positions in the subsequent qualification round with 3-1 records.
NRG Esports represented the only non-European organization among the top five advancing teams. Despite an unexpected day one defeat, NRG demonstrated championship resilience by winning three consecutive matches to claim their Legends Stage berth.
Performance Analysis: Teams achieving 3-0 records typically benefit from favorable map draws and opponent matchups, while 3-1 qualifiers typically overcome early challenges through strategic adjustments.
The 3-2 qualification bracket produced the most intriguing narratives. Avangar narrowly secured advancement with a victory over Syman Gaming, though their performance level suggested limited Legends Stage potential compared to their impressive Katowice Major showing months earlier.
DreamEaters emerged as the tournament’s Cinderella story, defying analyst predictions of an 0-3 exit. The Russian squad compiled a 3-2 record against elite competition, creating momentum that could translate to Legends Stage success.
Team Vitality completed the advancing roster despite underwhelming performances. The French organization struggled throughout best-of-one matches and required a tense 2-1 victory against Australian contender Grayhound Gaming to secure their progression.
Qualification Patterns: Teams advancing with 3-2 records typically face elimination match pressure, which can either forge mental toughness or expose strategic weaknesses.
Teams Eliminated from the StarLadder Berlin Major Challengers Stage
While eight teams celebrated advancement, an equal number saw their Major aspirations conclude prematurely. The elimination results contained few major surprises but revealed significant regional implications.
TYLOO and INTZ Esports became the first departures with 0-3 records against formidable opposition.
TYLOO’s elimination aligned with expectations, as the squad would have needed exceptional performances to replicate their Katowice Challengers Stage success.
INTZ Esports occupied a challenging position with abundant individual talent but limited recent competitive results. Their exit negatively impacted Pick’Em predictions and signaled potential difficulties for Brazilian Counter-Strike throughout the event.
Complexity Gaming’s elimination generated significant discussion despite their competitive struggles. The organization competed with an incomplete roster configuration, prompting CEO Jason Lake’s public commitment to comprehensive roster reconstruction.
The CIS region experienced contradictory outcomes throughout the Challengers Stage. While Avangar and DreamEaters provided positive regional representation, ForZe, Syman Gaming, and HellRaisers all failed to advance.
Furia Esports’ departure represented the most shocking elimination. Widely considered Brazil’s premier CSGO squad amid MiBR’s organizational challenges, Furia had demonstrated consistent high-level performances including DreamHack Masters Dallas top-four placement and ECS Season 7 Finals runner-up finish.
Regional Impact Assessment: Brazilian Counter-Strike faces strategic reevaluation following multiple team eliminations, while European dominance appears increasingly established.
Grayhound Gaming concluded the elimination list after showing promising moments during the stage. The Australian team ultimately fell to Team Vitality in a challenging elimination series matchup.
The Challengers Stage results reveal critical patterns with significant implications for the Legends Stage and beyond. European teams demonstrated systematic superiority, while other regions face strategic reassessment.
Performance Evaluation Framework: Teams should assess their stage performances across multiple dimensions: individual player form, tactical execution, map pool depth, and in-game adaptation capabilities.
Eliminated organizations now confront divergent futures. Some will maintain current rosters for regional competition, while others undertake substantial roster transformations during the upcoming month.
Legends Stage Preparation: Advancing teams must address identifiable weaknesses exposed during the Challengers Stage. Teams that struggled in best-of-one formats particularly require strategic adjustments for Legends Stage success.
The advancing eight squads now prepare for Legends Stage competition against the world’s elite Counter-Strike organizations.
For teams seeking to improve their competitive positioning, our Class Guide provides valuable insights into role specialization and team composition strategies that translate across esports titles.
Roster Construction Principles: Organizations contemplating changes should consider player synergy, role distribution, and strategic flexibility when building new lineups.
All eliminated teams will focus on recalibration and preparation for the next Major championship in 2020, with many likely implementing significant structural changes.
Understanding these competitive dynamics can enhance your appreciation of high-level esports strategy. For comprehensive competitive gaming insights, explore our Complete Guide to strategic gameplay across multiple titles.
Action Checklist
- Analyze team performance patterns across different match formats (BO1 vs BO3)
- Evaluate regional strength distribution and identify emerging competitive trends
- Assess roster construction effectiveness and identify potential improvement areas
- Develop Legends Stage predictions based on Challengers Stage performance indicators
No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Berlin Major Challengers Stage concludes, eight teams advance Complete analysis of StarLadder Berlin Major Challengers Stage results with strategic insights and team performance breakdowns
