TL;DR
- Astralis maintains 60%+ win rates across all seven competitive maps, creating veto phase advantages
- dev1ce’s 1.34 rating against elite teams demonstrates his clutch performance capability
- G2’s success hinges entirely on KennyS returning to his Katowice 2020 form
- Avoid Dust 2 bets when G2 plays and focus on Mirage opportunities
- Monitor first map performance metrics to adjust live betting strategies

The ESL Road to Rio European finals deliver a compelling championship matchup between two Counter-Strike titans. G2 Esports secured their spot following an intense three-map battle against FaZe Clan, establishing this regional contest as the only Road to Rio event progressing according to pre-tournament predictions.
Astralis appeared vulnerable during early tournament stages, potentially dropping multiple games en route to the finals. However, the Danish powerhouse eliminated FaZe earlier this week to guarantee their grand finals appearance. G2 mirrored this achievement by winning their semifinal series against FaZe with a 2-1 scoreline. This outcome surprised many analysts, as both squads managed victories on their opponents’ preferred map selections.
Astralis demonstrated unexpected fragility during Europe’s Road to Rio initial phases, losing a series to Fnatic while also dropping individual maps against Complexity and Ninjas in Pyjamas. Yet characteristic of Astralis’ championship pedigree, the Danish roster stabilized and dominated the tournament’s concluding stages.
The organization secured its championship finals position through consecutive 2-0 playoff victories against both G2 and FaZe. Astralis once again claims top positioning in both Road to Rio standings and global rankings, a familiar scenario for enthusiasts craving fresh competitive narratives.
Nicolai “dev1ce” Reedtz has consistently ranked among his team’s top two performers throughout Astralis’ recent four matches, accumulating a collective 191-152 kill-death ratio with an impressive 1.34 average rating. These statistics become more remarkable considering dev1ce produces superior numbers when facing higher-caliber opponents compared to lesser teams. While dev1ce’s analytical approach to Counter-Strike can disadvantage him versus unconventional opponents, it becomes an extraordinary weapon against squads employing fundamentally sound strategies.

Unless opponents execute baffling plays that defy logical anticipation, dev1ce typically delivers exceptional performances. Facing veteran G2 AWPer Kenny “KennyS” Schrub typically presents few unexpected scenarios for dev1ce, suggesting he’ll maintain his winning trajectory against G2. This consistency makes dev1ce a reliable fantasy selection, while Astralis collectively represents a strong roster choice. Although in-game leader Lukas “gla1ve” Rossander regularly occupies the bottom position on Astralis’ scoreboard, even he has maintained positive kill-death ratios throughout the past five Road to Rio series. The central question shifts from “how effectively will Astralis perform” to “how competitive can G2 remain?” The perennial challenge, as historically demonstrated, centers on Astralis’ comprehensive map proficiency.
Astralis’ Map Pool (total)
- Inferno 9-2, 81%
- Vertigo: 5-2, 71.4%
- Overpass: 7-3, 70%
- Dust 2: 9-4, 69.2%
- Train: 4-2, 66.7%
- Nuke: 6-4, 60%
Astralis’ statistical dominance becomes staggering when examining their minimum 60% victory rate across all seven available competitive maps. In tomorrow’s best-of-five championship series, this establishes the Danish roster as definitive favorites. These impressive success metrics over the preceding three months occurred entirely in online environments, not traditional LAN settings. Given Astralis’ historical supremacy in front of live audiences, questions emerged regarding their ability to sustain dominance without crowd energy to intimidate opponents. Astralis has conclusively addressed these doubts through their performance consistency.
Rewinding to IEM Katowice 2020, G2 narrowly missed defeating an ascending Natus Vincere for the championship title. Although they didn’t claim the trophy, one player demonstrated that time hadn’t diminished his skills as significantly as spectators and analysts presumed. KennyS appeared rejuvenated by his teammates’ support and demonstrated form reminiscent of his peak performances with Titan eSports.
For undetermined reasons, KennyS has performed at decidedly average levels throughout G2’s Road to Rio campaign. It remains uncertain whether this performance shift stems from the transition to online competition or other influencing elements, but the player instrumental to G2’s Katowice success has become the missing element G2 currently requires. KennyS isn’t actively hindering G2’s progress, but the team requires KennyS’ peak performance to establish themselves as genuinely threatening contenders.

G2’s Map Pool (total)
- Inferno: 4-1, 80%
- Vertigo: 6-2. 75%
- Nuke: 6-3, 66.7%
- Mirage: 5-3, 62.5%
- Train: 2-2, 50%
- Overpass: 1-1. 50%
- Dust 2: 6-11, 35.3%
Recently, G2 in-game leader Nemanja “nexa” Isaković has assumed leadership responsibilities. nexa delivered an outstanding performance against a FaZe Clan roster featuring multiple players operating at peak efficiency. His 75-47 kill-death ratio accompanied a 93.8 average damage per round while leading all players with a 1.39 rating across G2’s three-map series versus FaZe. Despite these impressive statistics, replicating such performance levels still proves insufficient to propel G2 past Astralis.
This performance level sufficiently positions him as a fantasy roster consideration.
Regarding wagering lines for Europe’s Road to Rio championship finals, Astralis should capture the best-of-five series, though G2 shouldn’t be completely discounted, particularly if KennyS delivers premium performance. Following the initial map conclusion, bettors should evaluate KennyS’ performance metrics. If he maintains ratings exceeding 1.2, placing wagers on G2 securing one or two maps represents sound betting strategy. The most alarming statistic involves G2’s persistent preference for selecting Dust 2. The organization maintains a concerning 35.3% victory rate on this classic competitive map.
Avoid pistol round wagers unless betting favors Astralis. The Danish roster possesses a 60.5% pistol round success rate. Some gamblers might feel tempted to leverage G2’s capability to win second rounds following pistol victories, but this represents questionable betting logic. Astralis additionally maintains an extraordinary 87% second-round win percentage after securing pistol rounds.
Alternatively, identify opportunities for G2 to capitalize on their primary strength. If they successfully maneuver Mirage through the veto process, however improbable that scenario appears, they become near-certain winners on this specific map. It represents the singular map Astralis systematically avoids, while simultaneously serving as the map G2 strategically lured FaZe into during their semifinal encounter. Even without Mirage entering rotation, G2 remains competitive across most remaining maps. The ultimate outcome fundamentally depends on whether KennyS delivers championship-caliber performance.

For comprehensive strategic guidance on team compositions and weapon selections, consult our BF6 Class Selection Guide covering optimal loadout configurations.
The championship matchup ultimately revolves around Astralis’ systematic excellence versus G2’s explosive potential. While Astralis presents the logical favorite given their map pool depth and consistent performances, G2 possesses the individual talent to create competitive moments. Strategic bettors should monitor KennyS’ first-map performance as the primary indicator for potential upset scenarios. For those seeking deeper understanding of game mechanics and weapon systems, our BF6 Weapons Unlock Guide provides detailed progression pathways.

Successful esports wagering requires combining statistical analysis with real-time performance evaluation. The transition to online competition hasn’t diminished Astralis’ strategic advantages, though it has created new variables for analytical consideration. For complete strategic coverage and advanced tactical insights, explore our Battlefield 6 Complete Guide covering all gameplay elements.
If you are looking for an esports bookmaker, feel free to try out winners.bet and if you’re looking to find a specific betting related feature or read reviews of bookmakers, visit winners.net
Action Checklist
- Monitor KennyS’ performance rating after first map – adjust bets if >1.2
- Avoid Dust 2 wagers when G2 is involved
- Focus pistol round bets on Astralis only
- Identify Mirage opportunities during veto phase
- Evaluate Astralis’ second-round conversion rates after pistol wins
No reproduction without permission:Games Guides Website » Astralis vs. G2 Esports ESL Road to Rio EU betting analysis Expert analysis of Astralis vs G2 matchup with betting insights and strategic map pool breakdown
