TL;DR
- Leaked emails reveal Astralis players wanted RFRSH separation long before public announcement
- Contract extensions through 2021 included separation commitments between team and tournament organizer
- Organizational restructuring involved employee role separation and shareholder level changes
- RFRSH CEO publicly announced split while internal emails showed ongoing separation planning
- The situation highlights esports industry challenges with tournament organizers owning competing teams
The separation between Astralis and their parent organization RFRSH Entertainment involves deeper complexities than initial reports suggested, with internal communications revealing extensive behind-the-scenes planning.
Recently published leaked correspondence from Dexerto exposed that Astralis competitors had expressed interest in distancing themselves from RFRSH for an extended period. The communication emerged following professional criticism directed at the Counter-Strike: Global Offensive roster regarding their choice to bypass major competitive events in favor of RFRSH-organized tournaments.
The disclosed message begins by confirming contract extensions for the entire competitive roster through 2021, encompassing all five starting players and strategic coach Danny “zonic” Sørensen. Among Astralis’s strategic objectives was a firm commitment to “further distinguish the operational and ownership structures between Astralis and BLAST.”
According to the internal communication: “As we project toward 2020 and potential league development opportunities, we must acknowledge that the commitment made two years prior—to establish distinct ownership between competitive entities and team operations following an establishment phase—has reached maturation. The Astralis professional players have, as documented through their public communications channels, experienced this dynamic directly, and I’m confident it has influenced their performance since the Miami competitive events.”
Within the correspondence, Astralis management indicates that while definitive decisions remain pending, they anticipate clarifying operational responsibilities in upcoming months. This involves distinguishing personnel assignments between the separate business entities and establishing exclusive dedication to either BLAST operations or team management functions.
“Additionally, this development signifies that we’ve initiated preliminary discussions with potential investment partners regarding acquisition of majority ownership stakes in Astralis currently controlled by individuals with BLAST affiliations, thereby finalizing our pledged separation at the investor level,” stated the internal message.
The correspondence concluded by emphasizing that Astralis, Origen, and BLAST have collectively “established exceptionally unique accomplishments within competitive gaming,” and while organizational pride is warranted, the future operational pathways for these enterprises require distinct separation.
Prior to the email disclosure, RFRSH Entertainment chief executive Nikolaj Nyholm issued an official statement confirming that both Astralis and Origen would operate independently from the parent company. The competitive organizations would function under a newly established entity temporarily designated as RFRSH Teams.
“We take pride in the athletic performance framework and structural foundation we implemented for Astralis and Origen. The time has arrived for these teams to establish autonomous operational capabilities. Astralis demonstrates financial sustainability while Origen ranks among the top three Western League of Legends competitive organizations,” Nyholm declared.
This situation highlights critical considerations for esports organizational structures, particularly regarding potential conflicts of interest when tournament organizers maintain ownership stakes in competing teams. Professional players often face scrutiny when perceived organizational affiliations influence competitive decisions, creating complex ethical and operational challenges.
The separation process demonstrates how established esports organizations navigate the transition from integrated business models to independent operational structures. This evolution reflects broader industry trends toward specialized organizational frameworks that prioritize competitive integrity and player welfare.
For teams considering similar organizational changes, establishing clear separation timelines, maintaining transparent communication with competitive partners, and ensuring player contract protections during transitions represent essential strategic considerations. Understanding these dynamics can help competitive gaming professionals make informed decisions about their organizational affiliations.
Action Checklist
- Review existing organizational structures for potential conflicts between tournament operations and team ownership
- Establish clear separation timelines for distinct business entities
- Implement transparent communication protocols with all stakeholders during organizational transitions
- Develop player contract protections that account for potential organizational restructuring
- Monitor industry best practices for esports organizational independence and conflict mitigation
No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » Astralis leaked emails on RFRSH reveal team had long wanted to leave Astralis players' long-standing desire to separate from RFRSH revealed through leaked email correspondence