TL;DR
- ENCE captain allu denies dictatorial control over roster decisions amid podcast allegations
- Team reduced to three active players following suNny’s bench transfer and previous departures
- Finnish organization faces performance crisis with zero major wins since roster changes
- Internal conflicts and public drama creating organizational instability
- Timely management response crucial for team recovery and fan confidence
ENCE’s strategic leader and primary rifler Aleksi “allu” Jalli has publicly addressed recent accusations made during a Finnish podcast broadcast. The veteran player faced criticism for allegedly influencing the controversial decision to bench Aleksi “Aleksib” Virolainen, a move many analysts believe triggered ENCE’s competitive decline.
The Finnish podcast platform Urheilucast reignited tensions within the ENCE organization that had previously shown signs of stabilization. The host leveled serious charges against allu, asserting he exercised decisive influence in transitioning Aleksib to the substitute roster. According to the broadcast commentary, allu reportedly felt threatened by Aleksib’s rising popularity and competitive achievements following their impressive Katowice Major 2019 performance.Concrete evidence supporting these assertions appeared lacking. Nevertheless, the host maintained he received this intelligence from credible sources within ENCE’s inner circle. The podcast narrative suggested allu perceived his status as the Finnish organization’s flagship player was diminishing.
The ENCE squad captain acknowledged the podcast content and articulated his position through multiple Twitter posts. The Finnish team leader clarified that no teammates had previously raised these concerns privately before their public disclosure.
“Regarding the Urheilucast podcast content, I must emphasize these allegations lack credibility. I encourage everyone to carefully consider the consequences of public accusations against individuals. I find Seppänen’s podcast commentary personally damaging and fundamentally disrespectful,” allu stated publicly.
The experienced captain further acknowledged committing errors throughout his professional journey, while emphasizing his consistent preference for confidential conflict resolution. He explicitly refuted possessing authoritarian authority concerning roster adjustments and organizational policy decisions.
This additional development in the ongoing ENCE controversy undermined management efforts to stabilize team morale. The Finnish esports entity had recently issued official commentary addressing preceding tensions involving Jere “sergej” Salo, allu, and Miikka “suNny” Kemppi-related drama through formal organizational communication.
pic.twitter.com/EfaeANHSAz
— ENCE (@ENCE) December 16, 2020
ENCE at its weakest after suNny’s departure
The podcast episode where allu disclosed previously confidential information regarding the significant 2019 roster restructuring that resulted in Aleksib’s removal from the starting lineup has generated escalating controversy. Aleksib’s transition to OG fundamentally destabilized ENCE’s competitive foundation, leading to absence of major tournament victories for the Finnish squad.
-
allu speaks on ENCE struggles, dropping aleksib, and more
“I certainly participated in the decision-making process, but the responsibility wasn’t exclusively mine—I don’t possess absolute authority determining all organizational directions,” allu clarified.
Management response timing proved suboptimal regarding the escalating drama, as negative consequences had already materialized. Escalating tensions between allu and suNny culminated in the latter’s move to the substitute position, leaving ENCE with merely three competing members.The Finnish competitive organization experiences substantial performance deterioration following two roster departures citing psychological and physical wellness considerations. suNny’s exit compounds ENCE’s deteriorating competitive situation, while ongoing podcast discussions exacerbate organizational challenges.
-
ENCE CSGO woes continue as Finnish team benches suNny
Successful esports organizations typically implement structured decision-making frameworks that distribute authority across multiple stakeholders. Teams experiencing internal conflicts often benefit from establishing clear communication channels and conflict resolution mechanisms before issues escalate publicly.
Common organizational mistakes include delayed public responses to escalating rumors, which can amplify negative perceptions among both fans and potential sponsors. Organizations should develop crisis management protocols that include timely official statements, internal mediation sessions, and transparent communication with the community.
For advanced roster management, consider implementing player feedback systems, performance metrics evaluation, and psychological support resources. Recovery from such organizational crises typically requires 3-6 months for roster stabilization and 6-12 months for competitive performance recovery.
The fundamental team mechanics analysis reveals that sustainable success depends on balancing individual star power with cohesive unit dynamics. Organizations must navigate the delicate balance between accommodating player preferences and maintaining competitive strategic direction.
Action Checklist
- Establish transparent communication channels between management, players, and community
- Implement structured conflict resolution protocols for internal disputes
- Develop comprehensive roster strategy with backup plans for player departures
- Create player wellness programs addressing motivational and health concerns
- Establish timely response protocols for public controversies and media allegations
No reproduction without permission：Games Guides Website » allu refutes claims on roster changes as ENCE drama continues Analyzing ENCE's roster turmoil and leadership crisis following suNny's departure from the team